Hello Patrick,
I am just curious about your comments on the Geneva-sealed movement in the LUC Twist being the "determining" factor over these two versions of the Twist. Apart from the more decorated rotor and the swan neck regulator in the 1.96, I really can't tell the difference between the two movements. Granted that I haven't seen both watches in the metal and I am only comparing from the photos posted in this particular post.
Seems to me the Cal 96T in the Tech Twist is based on the 9.96 in the QF which is also a well-finished movement sans Geneva seal.
Would be grateful if you could share more of what/where you see are the differences between the two movements in these two latest Twist.
Sincerely,
Tat
P/S My vote goes to the Tech Twist. Looks uber-cool ;-)