Ok thanks all of you for your thoughts. Now my serious question is do you prefer one of these over the other? Thank you. This helps!
Stainless steel (photo courtesy of Monochrome watches) Or ...
Shiny Bulgari speaks to me
Both in pictures and in the airport watch boutique where I tried one on a few months ago. Black? No thanks. Cazalea
Get ceramic if you already have a blingy piece
There is nothing like this watch. Even the buckle is in ceramic! Goes from full phantom to pretty legible. If you have a blingy pice like a Royal Oak or want somthing totally diff in your collection. Get it. Not a an only piece. ...
The Ti or ceramic for me.
The ceramic is super cool and something different when the mood or outfit warrants it. Also the lightness on the wrist is unbelievable. Diversity keeps the passion alive! My recent ceramic & Ti is this one, mainly for the WR. The Master Chronometer Co-axi...
in pics, I loooooove this watch
It is a miracle that--considering it is --essentially--a Royal Oak wannabe--like all watches of this type that ever followed RO including Nautilus---that it absolutely claims original, fantastic, sharp, DNA--what a feat that it is ITSELF and original! Tha...
Keep it classic and cool: stainless steel!
All black is "childish" ... To me only(!), before all are offended again 😀
Ed, not to confuse matters further but I think the Titanium is by far the best execution of this watch.
The SS is too severe for this size of watch and bracelet. The sand blasted ceramic may be too dark of a finish, I find that black cases / bracelets work best when the colouring is closer to a dark grey than jet black. This one seems to be jet black.
I haven't seen the ceramic
But the steel for me is a little too bright to the point of being sterile. I own the titanium and love it. I wear it for weeks at a time and it is totally fine for daily wear. My only complaint is that the micro-rotor seems to be too small to truly wind t...
