Yes. 15300.

Oct 28, 2019,14:33 PM
 

I must admit I’ve never seen the Jumbo in person but the 39 mm feels just right for my wrist. It lays perfectly on it. I’ll have to check the thickness..,

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

I had forgotten how much I enjoy this one.

 
 By: gsoliman : October 27th, 2019-21:25
Robust feeling but still thin. ...  

Very nice watch. Wonderful picture. 👍

 
 By: geross : October 27th, 2019-22:26
I think it's 37 mm in size. How thick is it? Enjoy in good health. 👌 Geross

Shud be 39mm if it's 15300 (nt)

 
 By: 中野れい : October 28th, 2019-00:20
e

15300?

 
 By: 中野れい : October 28th, 2019-00:18
I used to have jumbo jubilee so this would be thick vs the jumbo haha... but the RO's white dial is handsome!

This one is a classic

 
 By: Hds : October 28th, 2019-00:54
Looks really good on your wrist

A classic indeed!

 
 By: kkochheiser : October 28th, 2019-08:12
And, IMO much better proportions than the later, larger versions. Kent ...  

Yes. 15300.

 
 By: gsoliman : October 28th, 2019-14:33
I must admit I’ve never seen the Jumbo in person but the 39 mm feels just right for my wrist. It lays perfectly on it. I’ll have to check the thickness..,

15300 was my first time / date Royal Oak.

 
 By: MichaelC : October 29th, 2019-17:47
I do prefer the 15202, but respect this 15300 quite a lot. A touch more robust for sure.