SIHH 2008: the new Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Ultra Thin range

Apr 16, 2008,13:57 PM
 

Ultra thin watches have lost most of their prestige in the last decades as the quartz era has made us forget the mastery they require!

 

On the contrary ultra thin watches remain for the calibre amateurs and the real horology fans a real proof of great talent!

 

Ultra thin watches took a very important place in Jaeger-LeCoultre's history. In fact Jacques-David Le Coultre came to answer Edmond Jaeger's search for ultra thin calibres in 1903. That's ultra thin calibres and LeCoultre's talents in this specialty that initiated the great encounter and the beginning of the 2Oth century's history of JLC! No less!

 

The record calibre 145 was the first brick, a 1.38mm thick pocket watch calibre created in 1907 and powering some great watches from that time (among them some absolutely fantastic Cartier ultra thin pocket watches).

 

I won't sum up now the numerous calibres developed then by LeCoultre and later Jaeger-LeCoultre!  smile

 

The most recent ultra thin calibre is the well known calibre 849! We'll see it again in the next years.

 

For your information it was deeply reviewed here: http://www.thepurists.com/watch/features/8ohms/jlchw/index.html

 

Now let's have a look at the new offerings.

 



Jaeger-LeCoultre  40mm Master Grande Ultra Thin auto in pink gold

 

The first new model is defined as the Master Grande Ultra Thin, an automatic 40mm three hands watch cased in what is indeed a thin case. smile

 

The watch is powered by a 3.98mm thick calibre 896, a small seconds version of calibre 899 with variable inertia balance and ceramic ball bearings.

 



The automatic calibre 896

 

I let you judge by yourself of the thinness of this watch. The case is apparently 8.62mm thick. What I can say is that it is indeed quite thin on the wrist.

 



The real eggshell colour of the new pink gold Master Ultra Thin models

 

The design of this watch is awesome in fact (IMO of course). No date, a small seconds, a really thin case and the great pleasure of wearing everyday an automatic watch!

 

I personally don't like much so far the eggshell colour of the pink gold versions' dial, but I've also seen the steel version on Janek Deleskievicz wrist and the sunray-brushed silver colour is perfect for me!

 



Master Grande Ultra Thin auto profile

 

The new mainstream choice in the range is quite probably going to be the 38mm hand wind Master Ultra Thin in steel.

 

This new enlarged version has a greater size, becoming a modern ultra thin. I'm glad that JLC didn't go larger than 38!

 



The new 38mm Master Ultra Thin hand wind in steel

 

The older version in 34mm is supposed to remain available and is more seen by JLC as a women's ultra thin now (something nobody will convince me of, but who cares as now I want both sizes).

 



The old lady in 34mm

 

Both models in 34 and 38mm share the same calibre 849, a real marvel of 1.85mm of thickness!

 



The two hand wind Master Ultra Thin models side by side, 38 vs 34

 

The 38mm has a stronger dial, maybe more casual than the "dresser" and simpler 34mm version.

 



38mm Master Ultra Thin in steel

 

I've long been in love with the 34mm version, that I still love but yes the larger version is dangerously appealing.

 



Amazing dial for the steel version

 

Did you know that the calibre 849 is so demanding, so thin, that it is assembled in the Watchmaking Specialties Workshop of JLC with the most complicated pieces like the minute repeaters?

 



The 34mm old lady simpler dial

 

Obviously the question we had before SIHH was about a new calibre. We would have loved to discover a new enlarged calibre but apparently there was no sufficient reason to improve on the 849. I admit it is a very appealing calibre. Now that we keep the same, can we do with it?

 



The new 38mm hand wind case back

 

In fact if you look at both backs I admit the 849 doesn't annoy me in the 38mm case. The kind of "blade" form of the cases help to admit a smaller calibre.

 



The old lady 34mm case back

 

The 38mm case is also thicker, said to be 6.31mm thick against the 5.75mm of the 34mm version.  In fact I didn't notice that the watch was thicker! It works perfectly well in fact.  

(note from  Dje: the 34mm thickness is finally 5.75mm and not 4.20mm as it was indicated to me before).

 



The new 38mm hand wind Master Ultra Thin profile

 

If you look at both profiles you'll notice that they seem very close looking.

 



The 34mm old lady Master Ultra Thin profile

 

Nicolas already presented the commemorative editions. I have a few more pics for our pleasure.

 



The commemorative pink gold 38mm Master Ultra Thin

 

If I wrote earlier that I personally don't like much the eggshell colour of the "standard" pink gold versions' dial, the chocolate dial of the commemorative edition is just gorgeous!

 



The real colour of the chocolate dial

 

The brown combo is very tasty and we can wonder why we don't see more often such colours!

 



Pink gold 38mm Master Ultra Thin case back

 

I'm not yet saying no to the old lady even if tempted by the younger sister!

 



The still deserving old lady

 

In fact I'd be happy to get a steel 38 to fit with a pink gold 34!  Am I asking too much? smile

 



The superb pink gold old lady

 

So you understand the great news is that we have a wider choice now and only good options.

 

You have to find yours! I have mine!

 

Dje

 

This message has been edited by Dje on 2008-04-16 14:02:08 This message has been edited by Dje on 2008-04-17 08:13:36 This message has been edited by amanico on 2008-04-20 11:37:27


More posts: CalibresMaster Ultra Thin

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

GORGEOUS perfection

 
 By: Mostel : April 16th, 2008-14:25
I LOVE these!!! The movement seems too small for the case but I can live with it, since it it SUCH a fantastic movement. Someone (Jack Forster? Sorry if incorrect) suggested that this year's Basel seems to be doing its best work 'looking backward' to simp... 

It's a speculation

 
 By: parazzini : April 16th, 2008-15:22
...but I think the increase in thickness of the 38mm is just a way of strenghtening the watch in case of a bracelet.

Good remark

 
 By: Dje : April 16th, 2008-22:33

Thank you

 
 By: Sitin : April 16th, 2008-18:21
Excellent choice of pictures. Thank you. After reading your report I am seriously considering getting the 38mm.

Sorry for you! :-)

 
 By: Dje : April 16th, 2008-22:35

Finally! I was looking for this last year...

 
 By: watchme : April 16th, 2008-18:58
along with a "Harmonized" Reserve de Marche (that'll probably come next year). I'd love to get the auto in steel with black dial for dress - since I probably can't afford the 1833 version. -Dean

Great work, Jerome!

 
 By: amanico : April 16th, 2008-19:34
I was very interested by the old but still avalaible 34mm MUT. Now that I saw it in the flesh, I prefer the 38mm, much easier to wear than the too small for e 34mm... It's true, we had a lot of questions or fear in mind whe discovering these new MUT... Wi... 

Thanks Nicolas! nt

 
 By: Dje : April 16th, 2008-22:38

How thin is too thin?

 
 By: ajlc : April 16th, 2008-21:58
Maybe JLC wanted to avoid legal problems.... Today's headline: FRANCE TURNS TO FINES, JAIL TO COMBAT ULTRATHIN IDEALS Passed by the lower house of parliament Tuesday, it makes the promotion of 'excessive thinness' a crime punishable by fines of up to $78,... 

Really?

 
 By: Dje : April 16th, 2008-22:40

Wise thought! nt

 
 By: Dje : April 17th, 2008-03:30

the mut is dead, long live the mut!

 
 By: bug : April 17th, 2008-03:35
I've always had a soft spot for the "old lady" 34mm mut, and must admit I was apprehensive when I first heard the news of the new one, particularly upon learning that it would use the old caliber. The result is however imho stunning, with my favourite bei... 

Damn it!

 
 By: tenken : April 17th, 2008-06:21
JLC is going to make my life a living hell this year. How am I supposed to choose?

Simple and stunning - just what JLC do best.....

 
 By: Andy : April 17th, 2008-09:28
With the brown strap on the 38mm it could almost be worn casual which the 34mm couldn't. I think this could appeal to a lot of collectors....!! Very tempted myself now..!! I'm sure if it was in platimun Nicolas would have already ordered one...;o) Great r... 

Wot, Andy? Plat 38mm?

 
 By: amanico : April 17th, 2008-09:31
Well, just the time to rob a bank, and I'm yours...LOLOL Seriously, the 38mm " 1833 " would please me a lot... Best. Nicolas

We'll do the.....

 
 By: Andy : April 17th, 2008-12:45
bank job together...then I can get the Polaris too..!!! LOL. How did that MUT feel on the wrist..?? It looked pretty good..!! Andy.

Wowow, Andy

 
 By: amanico : April 17th, 2008-13:22

Ultra thin numerals

 
 By: ajlc : April 17th, 2008-11:00
Interesting that the font on the 38mm is different than the old 34mm. The straight-sided (look at the 9) give way to wider, curvier numerals more like the rest of the Master Control range.

Weird, but

 
 By: parazzini : April 19th, 2008-13:07
Going to an AD in Milan, they showed me a catalogue with JLC novelties: the 38mm Ultra Thin featured the same numerals of the "old" 34mm... I don't know what to say...

Parazini

 
 By: amanico : April 19th, 2008-13:43
We checked with JLC about the thickness of the MUT 34 and 38mm. So the 34mm is not 4,20mm, but 5,75mm, and the 38 is 6,31mm. So the difference is only 0, 56 mm thicker and 4mm bigger for the new one... That's why, when we saw it, we had the impression JLC... 

Sorry for my English

 
 By: parazzini : April 19th, 2008-13:47
Nicolas, I intended that the FONT of the arabic numerals, on the catalogue, seemed exactly the same of the old model... Not a matter of thickness! Marco P.

Well, we both have problems with our English, my friend...

 
 By: amanico : April 19th, 2008-13:55
Maybe your dealer didn't already receive the new catalogues, as they're not yet available... May be an explanation.The photos we posted, Jerome and me, were taken form the new watches, and the other pics compe from the official press files. So I can tell ... 

Thanks, Nicolas [nt]

 
 By: parazzini : April 19th, 2008-14:10