vitalsigns
6298
Not sure what else we can provide that VC itself cannot.
Nov 02, 2023,21:47 PM
The dial printing and style does not seem legit, nor similar to any pieces accepted as genuine.
The movement is very crude, much too crude for VC; and AFAIK, VC has never signed its name across a bridge like that. VC would never have been part of the Holy Trinity if it put out garbage like this.
The buckle is not period correct. The Maltese Cross buckle is a modern design AFAIK.
The inside case is the least obviously fake part of the whole; but given the other elements, my guess is that the inside case back must be fake too...take for instance that poor attempt at an ampersand.
I'm surprised VC gave back the watch.
John
Comments:
view entire thread
Of academic interest
By: Tick Talk : November 3rd, 2023-14:17
Although forum policy generally forbids posting counterfeit timepieces, there has to be leeway for us to examine and discuss the elements that establish this diagnosis, particularly with regards to vintage V&C timepieces which are so vulnerable to being a...
Thank you!
By: Prashant_15 : November 4th, 2023-22:34
Thanks vitalsigns and tick tock! I too was surprised they gave it back. The boutique manager was also surprised as he used to work for JLC and they kept the watch if it were similar in circumstances. All vacheron said was counterfeit. Was wondering if may...