M4
5317
I immediately liked this one upon introduction.
Mar 27, 2017,18:19 PM
My hesitation: the case thickness. I haven't seen the thickness measurement published but it appears a bit puck-ish. Hopefully, the pics deceive and its 14mm or less, which would land the watch on my shortlist.
M4
Comments:
view entire thread
SIHH 2017: Ulysse Nardin Marine Tourbillon.
By: amanico : March 27th, 2017-13:35
I already wrote it, but 2017 re ignited my love for Ulysse Nardin, which unveiled a nice and interesting collection, this year. We'll certainly have the time to discuss each of them, but let me introduce you a watch from the 2017 collection which seduced ...
Difficult one this
By: kev09 : March 27th, 2017-14:29
Like you, I've always admired these UN marine chronometers. They seemed to me to look exactly like a marine chronometer should look; simple dial, easy to read, nice oversize sub seconds (surely essential on a chronometer) and that lovely red 1846.vThe new...
No it's not the tourbillon
By: kev09 : March 27th, 2017-14:46
It's just the overall look - the absence of lugs, the crown protectors and the rubber on the crown. The combination of these details just jars with me. I'm always the same when a watch I've admired for a long time gets a "modern makeover" however tasteful...
How about...
By: Horologically_minded : March 27th, 2017-17:03
The 150th anniversary dial, but with the tourbillon viewable only from the back a la Patek or Laurent Ferrier. Kind of like a secret beauty "for your eyes only". Best, J
I still think about this one from SIHH
By: Joepny : March 27th, 2017-17:04
so many new 2017 novelties disappear into the nether but this one has stuck with me. I too have a problem with the strap that is not sporting enough to put the 100m WR to use. A shame. But overall a great statement by UN and a challenge to the industry th...
I generally like it.
By: willski : March 27th, 2017-17:10
And I applaud UN for trying to rein in the ever growing pricing these days. I do feel the writing in the middle of the dial is quite large, and I'd be curious to see how it looked with smaller font (also not sure if Le Locle - Suisse is completely necessa...
Yes that's true.
By: willski : March 28th, 2017-18:50
Maybe I'm just less used to seeing 'Le Locle' and that's why it stands out more in my eyes.
Look at this...
By: amanico : March 28th, 2017-22:58
A Chrono from 1942: ...
I immediately liked this one upon introduction.
By: M4 : March 27th, 2017-18:19
My hesitation: the case thickness. I haven't seen the thickness measurement published but it appears a bit puck-ish. Hopefully, the pics deceive and its 14mm or less, which would land the watch on my shortlist. M4