I was surprised in searching the forum--so little on the Moonstruck. And yet I understand. It is by far the heaviest piece I own. It has pretensions to being one of the largest at 46mm x 15mm. When I wear it, I am conscious at all times that it is on my w...
BUT tis is certainly the delicious price to pay of owning such a beauty. Yes, I find the case too thick too big and too heavy. But I love it. Between this one, the Royal Blue tourbillon and the GP Constant Escapement, I must say that you killed me... In t...
unlike many other watches that are huge/tuna cans for the sake of being loud, in your face or ostentatious the Moonstruck has to be this size because of what it has going on inside of it. It is large because it has to be. Although it is a big watch, no do...
I may have a line on the set. We shall see. In doing my homework, looks like my complaints about setting the Moonstruck will indeed seem like sweet times.
Actually had a second chance at a Ghengis Khan. Turned it down, of course. Talk about a wallet problem! I have a sickness, but I won't let it bankrupt me. ;-)
Unfortunately I have not seen it in the metal. The amount of info is just mind boggling! High and low tides?! What other watch has this info? If I were you, I would love to wear the moonstruck often! It must also be a conversation piece. Cheers Gordon