watch-er
1820
Well I picked one up
who knows what the future holds. I liked the watch and admired this one for about a year in the jeweler's case. I like the minute markers on the full bezel, the added heft and the date sans cyclops. A clear winner to me
Excellent review.....
By: Andy : April 1st, 2017-13:04
It seems to be a very interesting subject at the moment. Although I like the new one, especially the size, it just isn't enough to fit in the collection and the previous 4000 is too similar to my sub to fit in the collection..!! Yours, Andy.
Very nice article, Imran.
By: amanico : April 1st, 2017-23:42
I like the way you compare the 911 and the SD. Maybe you could also say that like the 911, the new SD is bigger. Did it loose its spirit? I don't know. Somehow, yes, with this cyclop. I am not thrilled by the last opus, but I have to see it in the real be...
Excellent comparison!
By: Anatol : April 2nd, 2017-01:22
Owning a 1665 DR and a 16600 as well as a '68 911S and a 964RS, I can fully relate to your analogy. To me, however, the 996 of Seadwellers was the 116600, for similar reasons like those given by Alex: the bracelet endlinks that do not match the case horns...