amblin_xi
75
.
Sub no date all the way. I own the old version, it's a true strap monster and interestingly it's less common on the streets .
And instead of another vanilla Rolex, wait a bit longer and get the omega railmaster , there will be a non-limited edition coming soon . Based on the master co-axial movement It's basically the explorer and milgauss combined at almost half the price. What more could you want. ;-p
Dear Rolex Members
What do you guys think about the Sub Ceramic with no date and the Explorer 1, I am thinking to get both? Or should I pay some more to buy the WG Daytona with Oysterflex, it is nice. I already have the SS Ceramic Daytona in black dial. The Daytona in WG an...
.
Sub no date all the way. I own the old version, it's a true strap monster and interestingly it's less common on the streets . And instead of another vanilla Rolex, wait a bit longer and get the omega railmaster , there will be a non-limited edition coming...
Choices!!
The sub no date is an iconic watch no matter what the year it was made. I also agree it's very strap friendly. I own a 5513 from 1986 and it looks great on straps.
Explorer 1
I just got the 214270 Explorer 1. Outstanding no frills timepiece what it should be. Best of luck on your choices.
I would say both. Each of them have their raison d' être in a collection.
And don't forget the GMT MASTER. It is another quintessential Rolex! Best, Nicolas
Thank you Dear Sir
I already have the GMT Master II in blue black too. It is one of the watch a Rolex enthusiast has to have. Best regards, Baxter
Hard to say without knowing what else you have and if this is to be a daily wear or rotation piece.
For a casual sports watch I'm a big fan of the oysterflex Daytonas, and the WG has a very cool stealth factor. The Sub and Exp I are classics you can't go wrong with and well suited for daily wear. All good choices!
