foversta[PuristSPro Moderator]
20814
Thanks Anthony!
Yes it could be a good idea to see complicated Excaliber 42mm. The question is: what would be the position of this line when compared with the Monegasque?
I think that a "classic" PC like you show it would be perfect. But the skeletonized movements, the complicated Tourbillons and so on are better housed in the larger case IMHO.
Thanks for your comments!
Fx
Thanks Anthony!
By: foversta : September 16th, 2012-14:33
Yes it could be a good idea to see complicated Excaliber 42mm. The question is: what would be the position of this line when compared with the Monegasque? I think that a "classic" PC like you show it would be perfect. But the skeletonized movements, the c...
Thanks but...
By: marketsurfer : September 15th, 2012-18:27
Thanks for the fantastic review and photos. The Excalibur collection was by far my favorite watch series by any manufacturer. However, I do not like the new style ex42. It simply lacks the soul and power of the original --it looks off and very flat to my ...
Thank you
By: marketsurfer : September 17th, 2012-08:28
Thank you, Fx. I also note a disconnect between the aggressive and very cool nature of the new Excalibur marketing website and the softened nature of the watch. The new marketing would be a perfect fit for the original style Excalibur. I don't mean to be ...
Thanks FX
By: cisco : September 17th, 2012-01:18
As a 36mm watch fan, I did not appreciate the previous Excalibur, I see there a positive evolution where it is more wearable without losing its style. But at the same time I understand and agree with Marketsurfer, the "extravance" was also part of its sou...