Good question

Aug 15, 2016,14:39 PM
 

good question and no novice question - had the same several times..even in very early catalogs the RM011 was rated to 100m...

But as you know...it depends not only on that...there is no 100% assurance to be water resistant, even it is a diver watch.
I heard from many others, they went swimming with their RM011, me too....
Regards 
Bernd 

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

RM005/010/029 and water

 
 By: keks : August 15th, 2016-12:36
Novice question but would like to understand why RM005 has a depth rating of 100M and subsequent releases such as RM010 and RM029 has 50M. Did they become more conservative or is there a difference in construction? Other reasons? Much appreciate any thoug... 

Good question

 
 By: monaco68 : August 15th, 2016-14:39
good question and no novice question - had the same several times..even in very early catalogs the RM011 was rated to 100m... But as you know...it depends not only on that...there is no 100% assurance to be water resistant, even it is a diver watch. I hea...