amanico
[JLC Moderator]
373451
Yes, looks like the P has an enamel dial, but it is just lacquer, right? Superb. Yes, the P has my preference, because of the metal, but also because of the dial which has a bewitching depth and warmth.
This is a photo of "G" and "P" of Calatrava Ref.3796. I was satisfied with "G", but when I saw "P", I was drawn to something different.
The left one is ”G" and the right one is "P" I was planning to sell G once I got P, but I realized the unique charm of G and couldn’t do that.G is on the right t is difficult to see a clear difference in display other than on the back of the buckle. this ...
Great comparison, never have seen the difference so clearly
The almost warmth of the WG compared to the cold of the PT. If I would have to choose one, it would be the PT but I fully get it you kept the G. Br, Dirk
Very timely
I have been looking at the 5196G, the dial of the 5196P doesnt do it for me. The 3796 may be a bit too small for my liking though. I find that Pt cases can vary greatly, I tried quite a few Cartier CPCP which left me cold, must be tried in person as usual...
Nice duo, so many detail differences!
Do you know what material is the dial of G's? It really looks like some kind of enamel.. even better than enamel IMO and one of the key appeals of the 3796, but not present on all sub-references. It seems to depend on the production year
Thank you for the photos 😀
Very nice to see the subtle differences in shades and warmth between the white gold and the platinum. As an owner of a 5227g-001, I really like this creamy lacquer dial. 👍
Great to see G and P side by side !👍
If other metals exist, would you consider getting them to complete the set ?
I would prefer the heft of platinum on a thin watch like this...
...the dial is a bonus...
Hi Shun San, they are so alike
and yet so different ! Lovely pair !👍 Will you be double-wrested with these two ? 😇