mustu
263
well they can keep the rest.....
only the company as in the manufacturing units/people/design team etc the old collections can belong to them.
trust me there is a part in me that just would offer ...ha ha
value
By: octop8 : March 15th, 2007-03:54
Well, the question is not just how much they sell but how much money they make, i.e. profitability. As a broad brush, luxury brand companies sell at between 2-4 times the revenues they generate. Just broad brush of course, at the end of the day, you need ...
value...
By: octop8 : March 15th, 2007-03:58
So let's say PP makes 35,000 watches a year, average selling price of $10000 per watch (conservative, could be higher), you would expect at the top end (4 x revenues), around 1.4bn valuation. Very roughly of course.
396 million CHF
By: PeterCDE : March 15th, 2007-07:35
That is, the brand name ("Patek Philippe") only , according to Interbrand 2006 annuals (check interbrand.com). Assets and intellectual properties go extra, which certainly won´t come cheap. There you go. Cheers, Peter
Simple exercise
By: JC : March 15th, 2007-15:10
There have been mention of brand names, property, etc etc etc I do this for a living on the equity markets for a global investment bank and its all just about profitability and growth Someone mentioned Brand Name and Coca Cola. Did you know that Coca Cola...
Multiples
By: octop8 : March 15th, 2007-20:21
No the different multiples Coca Cola vs your "no brand names" are also a function of what the market perceives as growth prospects. Lower multiples might mean market perception of lower growth prospects, which would not be suprising for a company already ...
nice
By: Giulio Verne : March 30th, 2007-05:49
My opinion about is (this is my job i m a Private Equity Player) that if you do not Know the real numebers you can not tell a reasonable price. In my opinion, but is just a feeling the price could be 1 or 1,5 bilion of euro more or less by GV