small-luxury-world[Patek]
8725
Well ...
you didn´t mention the new/bigger/tougher movement 
imo
By: Bruno.M1 : November 12th, 2010-10:39
they made a mistake with the 5165/5167 They should have made it MUCH bigger and much thicker. I know Patek makes more elegant watches. And they talk about 'elegance sportive' if the mean the Nautilus. Good, but the new Aquanaut should have been a real spo...
photoshop request
By: Bruno.M1 : November 12th, 2010-10:52
Hi, Since you're good with photoshop .. and I can't use it at all I always thought the Aquanaut would look nicer without the small indices, can you delete them ? So only keep these fatter indices at 5-10-15-20-25-30-35-40-45-50-55-60
Why thicker?
By: Le Chef : November 12th, 2010-12:49
Seems counter intuitive to me. Surely that's a sign of a modular movement, poor design and poor packaging. Fine for Breitling but not for Patek Philippe. I keep trying on ROO's and Panerai's and can't figure out why they need to be so thick. Weight is not...
because
By: Bruno.M1 : November 13th, 2010-02:04
because a lot of people like it (like me). the ROO is the best selilng AP and Panerai also sells about 50.000 watches per year so there definitely is a market for these watches. They can keep the Nautilus like it is. So if you prefer them slimmer you can ...
Really nice, Imran.
By: AlexSunrise : November 12th, 2010-14:48
I am fascinated by your Photoshop skills and creativity. The thing that would really do it for me in the Aquanaut would be a more stylish pair of hands. I have always wondered how the Aquanaut would look like with the 5711's hands, perhaps a bit beefier, ...
Beater?
By: Gryphon : November 14th, 2010-11:37
I cannot relate the word beater and Patek in the same thought process. Sorry. The 5711 is just perfect as it is, want the height get the 5980. But when i am in the mood for a watch with more sport and less elegance I wear the ROO, which I happen to love, ...