WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

This is great to hear Whit but in my experience, you are the exception to the rule.

 

Now that is just my very short experience.  Unfortunately, there are too many ADs that have very different pricing structures for the SAME WATCH depending on the customer, time of the month/year, whether they will be able to extend their exclusive distribution or not etc... that force the buyer side of the equation to look for the most fair deal which may not need to be the cheapest in dollar sense but admittedly, price has a very large part to play.

I'm much more sensitive to price now... why? My experience with a high end lange... bought end of 08 at $X.  Today, it is priced about $10k lower in list terms.  Yes, that may be brought about by Lange and not the ADs per se.. but the reality.... I got stuffed.  Again, not due to AD practices perhaps but the same watch today can also have a $7K swing between competing ADs.  So in my case, that difference in the list and what I would have paid could easily have paid for a say.. Rolex Sub and the current discounted price swing example of $7K for someone looking to buy, a Rolex Sub as well.  Just as ADs have to survive and thrive by looking after their margins, I've learnt that as a buyer, I have to look out for me as well as the AD is not going to look out for me.  I consider the excess I paid for my lange as tuition and learning fees for entering this hobby (it was the 2nd watch I bought) and consider it dues paid and undertake that I won;t have to pay unnecessary excess again or at least not consciously.

Just sharing my perspective of the buyer side of the equation.  It would be much easier and less tiresome for the entire equation IF ALL ADs consistently had your pricing practice.

Locked login to reply
💰1877 Marketplace Listings for Rolex