johnngym
182
Sydney!
i used to live in Sydney (from 1995-2001) but i did not find any pateks (i mean vintage pateks) there. if you find any other vintage pateks please let me know! i will fly there to buy them (ha)!!
anyway thanks for the pic!
as for the hands, the other one that was for sale at Antiquorum (NOV/1999) had luminous hands as yours. so i think the hands of your amagnetic could be the original. here is the details of the other amagnetic.
movement number: 728965
case number: 2633167
regards,
john
This is my one
By: itt : April 4th, 2009-22:49
This seems to be the rarest dial version of this ref , I have only found one other - and I personally think its the best - like yours it has a large seconds register which I feel adds to the appeal...
Hi johngym
By: itt : April 5th, 2009-15:46
I bought this watch from a small local auction house in Sydney about 4 years ago. I had not owned or worn a watch for 25 years, but I was mesmerized by the dial, and just had to have it. I got it for a steel (ha ha), but it started a disease thats cost me...
Sydney!
By: johnngym : April 6th, 2009-05:49
i used to live in Sydney (from 1995-2001) but i did not find any pateks (i mean vintage pateks) there. if you find any other vintage pateks please let me know! i will fly there to buy them (ha)!! anyway thanks for the pic! as for the hands, the other one ...
niceee...
By: lobo : April 5th, 2009-03:51
When i saw the photo of the watches, it seriously blew me away! 9.99/10. No doubt. Simple, clean, elegant lines. Nothing compares with this watch from the modern day patek collection. Totally different from antimagnetic watches prduced today, i.e, MILGAUS...