Explore the ultimate Patek Philippe perpetual chronograph debate: 5204 vs. 5270 vs. 5970. Collectors share insights on design, wearability, and horological DNA.
Explore Patek Philippe's 2016 novelties from Baselworld, including the 5164R Aquanaut and 5170R chronograph. Mark in Paris reviews new models, design philosophy, and collector reactions.
Explore Patek Philippe's two-counter chronographs: 5170G, 5172G, 5070P, 5370P. Collectors discuss design, movements, and appeal of these iconic timepieces.
Explore why Patek Philippe chronographs with Lemania movements like the 5070 and 5970 command higher prices than in-house models. Dive into movement architecture, market dynamics, and collector preferences.
What are your thoughts ? Or should I add an incoming 5270 p salmon and enjoy all 3 and filter out something else In this process I may have to loose two or three smaller timepieces in addition .
Instead of the 5204P i would add the 5270P and enjoy all 3. Or a thought a bit outside the framework of options given... are you able to stretch it to 5370P? I have the 5370P black enamel and it is hands down my favorite modern Patek. Rahul
I would say keep the 5890 esp. the blue dial....it is a great timepiece (outside all the hype around on Nautilus). 5270P & 5170p would be great addition. 5204p....I'm not sure it is a good way if I put the other 3 opposite as choice. any of your choice......
My subjective opinion however is that though this split second PC is simply awe-inspiring, I would vote to keep your collection, particularly if you are to add a PCC to it. That way you will have a variety to choose and wear, and can always trade up later...