so a modern incarnation of the 3448 in stainless steel with a black or white enamel dial I suppose.... that would be amazing, incomparably better than the 5320 in my opinion, which is a nice piece I will add but nearly not as nice as this would be!
suppose you had the possibility to make a watch with Patek (to clarify I do not have this opportunity unfortunately...). Criteria broadly being a watch that would realistically be made, so using their case molds and dial capabilities etc and use one of th...
so a modern incarnation of the 3448 in stainless steel with a black or white enamel dial I suppose.... that would be amazing, incomparably better than the 5320 in my opinion, which is a nice piece I will add but nearly not as nice as this would be!
Confucius supposedly said, “How regrettable when purple usurps the place of vermilion” — could be interpreted as when the vulgar usurps the place of the noble
At this price point I wouldn't care any second about the name on the dial or the heritage behind that brand. You can love brands or you can love watchmaking where only the product itself matters. Each his own.
But I did say I prefer the brand and that encompasses the quality of the movements, the design of the watches, the reliability and the quality of service. But a bigger point for you to consider. This is the Patek Philippe forum and the original post asked...
But with movement from 5320. Basically it would look like current nautilus annual, but with two tiny circles. Then you retain more of the nautilus dial. Or 2526 enamel in black with updated 240 movement and transparent case back. Or original 2526 with PP ...
That is how I had envisioned the Nautilus perpetual.... but I suppose the quest for a thin perpetual forced use of the 240 base. Dial however loses some of the Nautilus characteristics I think... but it is a very beautiful watch nevertheless... I like the...