WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

Fascinating...

 

..fascinating, fascinating.

Thank you for your comments and for furthering my education. This 3940 is indeed a strange one! Just one point of possible disagreement - I think the Geneva Seal certification process is limited to an evaluation of quality of workmaniship eg. polishing/chamfering of screws. There's an optional "rate" evaluation that can be added to the process but it isn't required to achieve the Geneva Seal, though I think that is effectively mandatory if it's a chrono and the manufacturer wants to designate it as such. So, if the workmanship was up to standard whenever this 240Q was manufactured/inspected, then it will be up to standard today. 

Then, of course, PP broke ranks and introduced its own seal. That has much to commend it (leaving aside jibes about how the process, being in-house, cannot be "independent"). It embraces rate as well as workmanship, and it bears on the whole watch rather than the movement only. So, my resurrected 240Q and the watch as a whole do not carry that stamp. But am I concerned that PP would ever say that this watch wasn't produced to their exacting standards? Absolutely not!

I guess the only other option in PP's hands would have been to take the Geneva Sealed movement, then add a PP Seal too (if they could find room..). That would have been something really unique. Anyone out there heard of/seen a double-sealed movement??

 

 

 

  login to reply
💰1730 Marketplace Listings for Patek Philippe