came across 2 wonderful references recently...a vintage & a modern....

Aug 26, 2020,00:48 AM
 

3970 étanche 2nd series in yellow gold...

36 mm is not sized for today but it has a very good presence on the wrist plus i like the leaf hands​!

unfortunately this is timepiece had a case back, so couldn't take pic of the movement - but i suppose the movement fills the case aptly !!


the other timepiece i saw is quite famous among purists...i recollect the roll-call last year & it is no surprise why so many purists like this reference...the 5960

40,5 mm in Pt...the very first thing you realize is the heft of the watch...tad thick for a Patek but you soon get lost in the flamboyant blue dial.

very modern & can be a daily wearer...



personally i prefer 5960 esp. because of the blue dial, though 3970 is a classic in its own rights.

which one is your favourite ?!

Best,
mahesh.,


More posts: 39705960complicationsgrand complications

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

I would go with the 3970

 
 By: VinnieD : August 26th, 2020-01:12
Because of its leaf hands and my small wrist. 36mm is perfectly acceptable for me. Also, I am sucker for all things vintage. But that 5960 is really yummy too.
login to reply

i do love the leaf hands...it is why the 1st & 2nd series is much sensual than the rest of 3970 imho

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-05:23
it does wear bigger / feels more than 36mm on the wrist ! having both would be a blessing ;-)
login to reply

Hi Mahesh, both are great and I prefer the...

 
 By: GLau : August 26th, 2020-01:18
3970 because it is a PCC
login to reply

true...and also i think it is very proportional in terms of case - movement & dial layout !

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-05:25
thanks sir !!
login to reply

yeah. I'll go also with de 36 mm. I think it is a very good size. Fantastic and iconic piece the 3970 [nt]

 
 By: Rui : August 26th, 2020-01:23
login to reply

seem the interest on 36mm is coming back on timepieces...i read the first 3 comments & all vote for a 36mm

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-05:26
would it change if it was 5970 vs 3970 ?!
login to reply

They don't play in the same league, my friend. One is exquisite and a true Classic, the other is a King of Cool. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : August 26th, 2020-01:47
login to reply

+1, perfectly put😉 [nt]

 
 By: FabR : August 26th, 2020-01:58
login to reply

the vlad goes for both i suppose ;-) [nt]

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-05:26
login to reply

You suppose very well, my dear and very smart friend. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : August 26th, 2020-05:29
login to reply

Thanks Mahesh for a couple of terrific shots — two very different beauties and important references in their own right, which share an undeniable charm on the wrist!🥂 [nt]

 
 By: FabR : August 26th, 2020-01:57
No message body
login to reply

thanks Fab...one day i like to see the 3970 in white metal - i think the feel would be different...

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-05:28
in both cases, the movement to case size is very consistent.
login to reply

I believe so, even now that J gold is slowly coming back, I think I would still prefer the G...Hope you can add one to your nice collection if interested, these are really special pieces! ;-) Cheers. [nt]

 
 By: FabR : August 26th, 2020-10:11
login to reply

in deed Fab, working on that...i've affinity to 2nd series because of the leaf hands, i like them !

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-12:01
G in good condition would be great find...hope life brings me there !!
login to reply

👍👍🥂 [nt]

 
 By: FabR : August 26th, 2020-12:27
login to reply

You can't get wrong with one of these dream watches

 
 By: Watchlover42 : August 26th, 2020-02:44
and I'm fortunate to have both in my collection. Just in slightly different versions. My grey 5960 is more a daily wearer while my 3970R 3rd series is more for special occasions. Different watches in style and size but for my 17,5 cm wrist both work simpl...  
login to reply

wow...the first pic is absolutely well shot !

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-05:30
thanks for sharing...in deed a great pair you've got ! different feel from both the timepieces...36mm fits great on your wrist, very classy. Best, mahesh.,
login to reply

3970 for me, I just love that watch. [nt]

 
 By: Jay (Eire) : August 26th, 2020-03:23
login to reply

interesting...till now the most preferred one is 3970 !

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-05:31
that tells how much classy gentlemen our purists are
login to reply

The 3970 for me

 
 By: sham1 : August 26th, 2020-03:37
is the perfect perpetual calendar chronograph apart from its thickness. Okay so not so perfect then. In white metal, this watch is even better!
login to reply

thanks Sham - i agree, white metal is my personal preference too !

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-05:33
36mm is a very good size for classic timepieces & sure YES for a classic Patek ;-) Best, mahesh.,
login to reply

I have little doubt

 
 By: sham1 : August 26th, 2020-06:07
that one day Mahesh, you will add this a 3970G or P to your collection!
login to reply

you're too kind Sham - inshahallah !! [nt]

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-06:14
login to reply

Ameen! :-) [nt]

 
 By: sham1 : August 26th, 2020-07:46
login to reply

Wait, you mean movements used to be sized properly for cases? Weird. [nt]

 
 By: mdg : August 26th, 2020-07:38
login to reply

3970 All The Way!

 
 By: baufoam : August 26th, 2020-08:20
I love that watch! Have owned one for several years . Classic styling and practical. The 36mm size is excellent.
login to reply

I think so to...very classic timepiece & impressive complication too ! [nt]

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-09:13
login to reply

i think most movements that are in use today were designed with the case size in general was much smaller...

 
 By: mahesh : August 26th, 2020-09:13
what i meant is, the successor 5970 was 40mm but carried the same movement as in 3970 !
login to reply