WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Patek Philippe

Broad generalizations being made.

 


I think the car engine comparison to a watch movement is actually quite accurate. A car engine will continue to run until it doesn't. Sometimes there are tell tale signs that something is wrong and sometimes the issue is suddenly discovered and it is too late. Why run the risk of costly repairs? A simple maintenance service can easily eliminate huge issues. For example a broken timing belt will render a running engine a paperweight in seconds, while the maintenance job to change it may only be $1000 dollars.

A watch will work until it doesn't. Imagine all the gears and springs and screws that must function perfectly for the watch to work. Now imagine the incredible precision needed for the watch to function at COSC standards. 86400 seconds a day and the watch has to be perfect between 86396 and 86406 of all those seconds.

If so much money is being spent on these watches, why not have it serviced regularly instead of playing the service game and seeing now long you can go without a major failure? Furthermore, how do you know most owners of high end watches aren't collectors? How many people can really justify spending more on their watch than mode of transportation?

  login to reply