happyguy1688
516
372 vs 368
Hi I already owned a 232 and I have ordered both but if only 1 is to pick up, what would be yr choice and why? many thks

New Release
amanico · Jun 13, 2019
Explore Panerai's 2011 SIHH novelties: PAM 372, Submersible Bronze PAM 382, and new P.3000 movement. Expert analysis and collector debate on design and market impact.
62 replies35830 views

Reference Guide
Bill · Jan 14, 2021
Explore the Panerai PAM 390 Special Edition with Bill's original photos and collector insights. Discover its 'chocolate' dial, vintage appeal, and comparison to PAM 000 and PAM 232.
54 replies72408 views

Review
AnthonyTsai · Dec 9, 2009
Anthony Tsai reviews the Panerai PAM305 Luminor 1950 Submersible. Discover its 47mm titanium case, unique dial, and Paneristi appeal.
50 replies56196 views

Vintage
amanico · Feb 2, 2010
Explore the mythical Panerai Mare Nostrum, from its 1943 prototype to the 1990s re-editions and the new PAM 300. Discover its history, design, and collector appeal.
93 replies48680 views

Discussion
amanico · Aug 19, 2019
Is the Panerai PAM 372 or PAM 721 the ultimate modern Panerai? Collectors debate the brand's contemporary summit, comparing Luminor and Radiomir references, historical DNA, and market appeal.
66 replies17385 views

Collection
amanico · Mar 5, 2020
Explore the classic Panerai PAM 249 vs. PAM 232 dilemma. Discover collector insights on these 47mm Radiomir models, their unique dials, and historical significance.
74 replies16621 views
Likewise Stephen.
By: MichaelC : November 28th, 2011-09:43
Absolutely no animosity with our opinions. We're PuristS, exchanging our views. I certainly meant no disrespect to the 368 or its fans. Our specific models here are part of a bigger discussion, which can again apply to most brands. I do not fault Panerai ...
Yes.
By: MichaelC : December 1st, 2011-14:21
I have tried various PAMs over the years, and what I like most about Panerai is traditional Panerai. So a simple dial and movement work great for me. Still, some of the newer creations are haunting! I am not big on the whole "historically correct" thing. ...