They aren't rare watches, in both cases.
One is 45 mm big, and houses a JLC 8 Days movement, the other is 47 mm and houses an ETA movement.
The 232 has a brown dial, while the 190 doesn't ( except the platinum versions ).
One has a sapphire case back ( 190 ), the other doesn't ( which is a good thing, as the 232 sticks to the original 3646 ) .
Both are very appealing, and I would say that if you want to stay in some horological standards, I mean, if you care about the movement, so the 190 is for you.
If you don't care about the movement, the 232 is for you.
Simple, no?
Best,
Nicolas
This message has been edited by amanico on 2010-04-11 10:07:52 This message has been edited by amanico on 2010-04-11 10:32:37What would you do?
Best,
Nicolas
As I said simple I'd choose the 190.
However, for the moment I'm just going to sit back and hope that one day the 317 that I ordered back in october of 2008 comes in one day and if it doesn't then maybe I'll still be lucky and the 339 that I just ordered with show up first.
Best regards,
George

You're right, both are to be tested in real before any final decision.
Best,
Nicolas
I love my 232 and while it has strong historic links as a diving watch, it ultimately wears and looks more like a dress watch to me. This is were the problem rests for me, as a dress watch I just can't get it under a shirt cuff, I know it sounds pedantic but that's the reality.
I'm thinking of trading into a 190 purely for size because I just love the clean dial (oh, and the 8-day m'vmt
)
Have you considered the new PAM346?
This might be the better choice IMO, but the case is a 45mm titanium instead of steel cases in PAM190 & PAM232.
Brown dial, gold hands, in-house movement - what is there not to like?
Cheers,
Anthony
It ruins a bit the purity of what remains a nice watch. It just could have been, without date, a very nice watch!
Best,
Nicolas
I would have been happy to see one more nice watch from Panerai this year, after the 339, the Mare, and the Rad 42 mm with the manual " in house " movement.
Nevertheless, this is an excellent millesime, this year, IMO.
Best,
Nicolas


collectability and rarety factor should not be of your utmost cncern. Assuming that you're comfortable with both sizes, then it would come down to whether you have any preference on the dial layout and whether you care for the movement.
I don't think you will regret it, PAM 190 as some of the Radiomir DNA but it brings you closer to horological values thanks to that Jaeger-LeCoultre mechanics which in a big way is also true to G. Panerai when he selected an 8 Days movement for his 6152 & GPF 2/56 watches therefore offering less winding interactivities, protecting submergibility, only that Jeager-LeCoutre 8 Days is one of the 21st century, making it more reliable than the used predecessor and more accurate. A wise selection as the movement maker has a solid movements histories going back over 175 years.