Are you a hand-wound only Purist like me?!
Well if you are i definitely didnt know that till now!
Cheers!
Stephen
on the dial.
however, my opinion may change... until i see the real piece
great caseback and movement nevertheless
Because it deals with one of my grails, the 2533!
Well, even though Panny didnt do that this year, they might in the future! You can already see them doing that for this one!
A nice piece nonetheless, just wished that it was remontage manuel! Then i would have gotten it!
Merci for the report!
Stephen

Essentially you say "Don't all Panerais appear as dive watches?"
Clearly not - most Panerais do not have rotating bezels, many don't have movement indicators, and there are a whole slew of other requirements for "dive" watches. Nonetheless, I think you would find the majority of Panerai collectors prefer a solid caseback on a "Submersible" watch. It's just the way it is my friend. Reply again if you wish, but I won't see it.
Nor do you need to put words in my mouth.
If you find some of my posts, you'll see that I am one the pedants on the topic of what constitutes a dive watch.
I completely agree with you on the solid caseback issue. My point, which may have been badly made, was that Panerai's primary marketing was on it's links to dive watches. Such as they were at the time. That's all.
This message has been edited by BDLJ on 2009-01-26 20:22:45Clearly, it didn't 'speak' to me when I first saw the pictures. Now that pictures have been re-posted time and again, I am beginning to gather a sense of acceptance on these baton markers. Arabic numerals (3,6,9,12) are like a 'trade mark' to Panerai dials - apart from the unique Cali dial - but for once, I will second the motion of having baton markers on a Submersible. Personally, this proves to be a good diversification on the Submersible dials -- simple and true to Panerai origins, it is yet again a play of strong DNA and history.
The only thing that bothers me is a display case-back on a Sub. It's own helluva dive watch and a display case-back is too 'pretty' on it in my humble opinion. Nevertheless, I believe Mr.Bonati would like to display the creation of the new movement in some pieces of the new line-up, but why did he choose the 305, is what I really want to know


This watch is really interesting, indeed, because..
1º - It don´t has a magnifying bubble for the date... Well done... I don´t like this bubble in Pam models, it always disturbs me.
2º - The movement has 3 days power reserve. This movement, I think, is located between ETA´s and "Pam P200x Calibers". The strategy, for me, is really good.
3º - The 1950 case is a really good choice. It´s like a "mix" case, with the strong look of Luminor Cases and the sexy look of Radiomir Cases.
4º - The choice of Ti for made the case is good... this 47 mm would be difficult to wear in SS.
5º - The water resistant of 300 m is like it must be.
But, some things disturb me:
1º - The kind of indexes, this combo choice, disturb me a lot. And the origins of this mixed dial are no well choiced for me... The use of round and rectangular figures is a bit disturbing.... but, not bad at all seeing the watch by a general point of view, but I´d prefer "normal 3,6,9,12 Pam indexes".
2º - I´d prefer a solid case back... the finish of this movement is normal and I think that it´s not a "work of art" to show. The movement is hard, simple and tough, like it must be, but I´d prefer a solid case back (IMO).
But, in general, this 305 Sub is one of the most interesting watches made by Panerai this year.
Thanks for your post Nicolas.
Best
Emilio
at 47mm at a low price!
Alepos
However, my interests in Submersible has diminished when Panerai stop making the T-dial.
Cheers.