Comments:
Panerai PAM 587 Marina Militare. Some live pictures, finally!
I finally could take some live pictures of one of the most appealing modern Panerai, the PAM 587.
I find the PAM 372 very convincing, and so is the Marina Militare.
I still have to make my mind between these 2, unless I decide to not choose and take both of them! 
Best,
Nicolas
I find this reference very appealing, two it’s always better than one 😜 [nt]
No message body
For you....
and I mean...YOU...I think that the duo 587-673 would be just perfect. Both Mamma Mia, both with gorgeous vintage hands. Moreover, the case of the 673 fits the wrist a bit better than the 372's one. But this is only my opinion 
Hey Sergio, don't add more Panerai in my list! ;) I do get your point... Too well! [nt]
No message body
I've added the picture...for good measure LOL
The 673 would..replace..the 372. Your list would remain very short
The question is why it would sit better on the wrist than the 372??? [nt]
No message body
My answer....
because I've tried both and the 673 case has lugs that are ergonomically superior to the ones of the 372
That surprises me too sergio!
I know the lugs of the 673 and 587 are different but thought the 673 and 372 had the same case and lugs. I agree that the 673 and 587 would make a great MM set. But there's a case for the 372 -- chunkier hands complement rugged crown guard. If you prefer no crown guard, then the 587 and 662 would work well.
I have never seen a 662...
live and I'm not familiar with the lugs. The ones of the 587 though are different from the 673 and make the watch sit higher on the wrist, giving a "chunkier" feeling
I don't have a 372 handy....
for the "side to side" comparison I did with 587/673 but the "feel" of the two models on the wrist is different (for me). We know like a millimeter here, a millimeter there, can give a different feel to a watch. I could be wrong and trust my feeling too much, though
I've just risked loosing my eyesight....
looking at the lugs of my 605 (372 twin) and the 673, through a magnifying glass and discovered that the lugs of the 673 are infinitesimally slimmer, shorter and rounder than that of the 605.
Thanks for your efforts on discovering the difference, Sergio. It is a surprise for me. [nt]
No message body
I'm confused sergio ...
The 604 is your Firenze Radiomir, right? -- altogether different than a 372. Regardless, if you have a 372 twin Panerai and the lugs are different than those of the 673, that is interesting. I had always assumed that a 1950 Luminor case was a 1950 Luminor case, whether it's a 372, 673, or something else. I guess there are minor differences between otherwise very similar PAMs.
Your confusion is my fault....
I was referring to my..605. I've already modified my previous post. I was also surprised about the minute differences between the two cases. My referring to potential loss of my eyesight, when I observed the lugs under the magnifying glass, was intentional..LOL
Ah, thanks!
So interesting that the 605 and 372 lugs differ a tiny bit from those of the 673. I guess I'll keep my 673 ... unless Nicolas now needs one ;-)
Using a microscope I think I see fine print
... on my 673 that says, ‘designed for Nicolas’ ;-)
The differences are truly infinitesimal....
not like the 587/673 which I posted a while ago. I'll figure something out. Thing is, I'm not sure if the super-subtle difference in the 2 PIECES could be due to a production defect or to a real difference between the 2 production "batches" or original case design. Fair doubt, no?
A mystery, no doubt, but interesting nonetheless
Can I get one where the left lug is three nanometers longer than the right lug? Kidding!!!