So I've had this Glashutte Navigator Perpetual now for about two weeks and wanted to share some thoughts. This was a model that I kind of over looked when it was released a couple of years ago. I've always been a fan of this movement but have never owned one of GO's perpetuals so when I saw this piece in person it jumped out of the case at me just like the Panoreserve XL did. The brushed case kind of makes the rose gold look bronze but it has a nice effect against the black dial. I also really like the red leap year indicator on this watch as well, it too has a nice contrast against the dial. The watch measures 44mm in diameter but wears more like a 42mm watch to me.
The lume on this piece is off the charts, if I knew how you guys took those lume shots I'd show you. Its better that any Panerai or IWC that I've ever had, the lume stays strong for hours.
The movement is beautifully done, like all Glashutte that I've ever owned. This watch is limited to 100 pieces.
You can see due to the case size measuring in at 12.4mm, along with other attributes, this is a sporty piece. There are 4 pushers altogether that set the perpetual calendar. 3 on this side and one near the 2 marker on the other side of the case. The 5th pusher near the 8 on the very bottom resets the second hand, I don't know what function that has other than to set the time perfectly.
The crown is nice and big, it can tend to dig into the wrist a little bit but not a big deal.
This is the OEM strap that came with the watch, I think this piece looks much better on a darker strap as it matches the dial a little better. More to come on that later.
The buckle is very nicely done, I would have preferred a deployant though.
A wrist shot with the OEM strap.
Here is a dark brown aftermarket strap that I bought, I think the watch looks much better on this one.
Here a side by side picture of it with my other perpetual calendar, a Blancpain Le Brassus Split Second Flyback Perpetual. These two are very different watches, the Blancpain is much more of a technical piece as it has 3 more complications (well really two, it doesn't have a seconds hand) aside from that it could be worn to dressier occasions. The GO is a pure sport watch IMO. With that being said, it is a nice value when compared to other perpetuals on the market. It retails for half the price of this Blancpain.
I hope you guys enjoyed my two GO reviews. I very impressed with this brand and would highly recommend either watch.
Tony
This message has been edited by Dr No on 2010-10-03 15:09:08
Makes me want to revisit the attraction of GO
Thanks!
Ken
on your PanoMatic XL? I have a Panomatic XL and the lume is not very strong. I know the hands are small, but I wish it was not as faint. Does exposing the watch to strong light make any difference? I didn't know if light in a sense charged the substance on the hands/dial. Thanks
Stewart
for the reply. Your Senator is a great looking watch. I like the perpetual calenders with the window display. I think it helps to keep the dial from looking too busy. As you mentioned, I think Glashutte does a great job with the finish on their movements. The display back really adds a lot to the watch. I know you will enjoy it.
Stewart
this and the senator sixties panorama date and the new panoinverse are my favourite GO's. I just
wish they weren't owned by Swatch!
Thanks for the great write-up and photos. It's always nice when people share their experiences with a new watch....especially one that isn't widely-owned or is in limited edition (as is this magnificent piece). I also share your admiration for Glashutte Original (I've owned 4). They make terrific watches.
I own a G.O. Senator Navigator too (the Panorama Date Cal. 100) and I must confess that I've been somewhat ambivelent about the idea of a Pilot or Aviator watch using 18 Karat Gold. Visually, the interplay of a black matte/high lume dial with the gold metal case never quite worked for me. Also, I always wanted to retain some visual similarity to the original classic (WW II) conceptualization and construction of this type of watch. So I've always been drawn to the classic solid steel designs of this genre such as those by IWC, Archimede, Fortis and Muhle Glashutte, among many, many others.
Now on the point of 'historical consistency' I fully plead "Guilty" to the charge of 'intellectual dishonesty'....My G.O. watch has a 4:00 date function and sapphire display-back and I doubt that any pilot of a ME-109 in 1942 had either of those on their pilot watch. But I've just felt that going to an 18K gold case was a "bridge too far" (...pun intended) for me. If I wanted gold or platinum (and I did...) I always felt my (limited) funds would best be deployed toward a more formal, classic dress watch (hence, my AHL 'Richard Lange' piece...)
Thoughts? Replies?
Cheers
DB Darien
I've owned the Navigator date before in steel and sold it a month or two later. This piece is virtually the same watch with a slightly different dial and movement but in rose gold rather than SS. I really can't explain why I like this piece but really didn't like the steel non- perpetual version I had. Maybe it does have a little to due with the fact that this watch is out of place with a brushed gold case or maybe its because the watch is limited to only 100 pieces. I don't know what the exact reason is but I do like the watch and the complication very much.
I would agree with your thoughts on adding a gold watch to the collection. This piece wouldn't be it if you where only going to have one. Like the Panoreserve XL, its a nice 4th or 5th watch in a mature collection IMO as its a tough watch to classify. It certainly wouldn't hold up to a Richard Lange in the dress category.
Tony
I know...I just picked up my new strap last weekend.