WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Omega

canโ€™t keep them off your wrist ?

 
 By: Seeks : October 7th, 2017-23:05
i donโ€™t blame you, with such beauties !
smile

best regards
โ€” seeks

Thanks for your kind reply. You will get yours soon. [nt]

 
 By: swatchme77 : October 8th, 2017-03:51
No message body

Yep! Stunning! ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป๐Ÿ˜ƒ [nt]

 
 By: MCG (Markus) : October 8th, 2017-01:37
No message body

Thanks pal. [nt]

 
 By: swatchme77 : October 8th, 2017-03:51
No message body

Back when the jumbo Rail was in production, I tried it on . . .

 
 By: Dr No : October 9th, 2017-18:15
. . . at least three or four times at a dealer with an intent to buy.  Just couldn't do it . . . too damn big for my wrist.

Then, I couldn't pull the trigger on the sub-mid-size model nine or so years ago . . .





[my wrist, watch credit: Omega boutique]

. . .  as I managed to convince myself there would be a version soon with an in-house movement.

Well, I was right about the version . . . just not the soon part.

smile

Congrats not only on the latest acquisition (Nilo will be especially happy!), but also for the massive Rail that tried so hard to break in to my collection.

Art


The XXL is a tough choice

 
 By: swatchme77 : October 9th, 2017-20:11
Hi Art, Thanks for the kind words. agree with you that the railmaster Jumbo is a tough choice and anything smaller just doesnt replace that "want" for jumbo. I only hate the attention given by others when the jumbo is on the wrist. I like it as there is no date to adjust and just simple 2 hands. Its also manual winding....which i prefer.

The Seamaster 300 re edited this year is a killer. My favorite among the three. Very well done, Omega. If only they had a manual winding movement for the Railmaster!!! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : October 10th, 2017-01:00
No message body

Seamaster

 
 By: gary01 : October 10th, 2017-04:53
having seen all 3 of the trilogy in the metal, for me, the Seamaster is  #1 - it just feels right in every way.   Wear yours in good health!!