)
Nicholas, this is a most public-spirited contribution to assist any interested bidders.
I have to confess that certainly in respect of estimates, the auctioneers in this case seem to have simply hoped for high prices across the board at entry level, with less distinction for rarity or condition than I would wish for.
From recollection, the brief existence of the Patrizzi auction house set high standards in providing detail on the lots they sold, which I would wish that other auctioneers would study when compiling their auctions and catalogues. Still too much is being left to guesswork of interested bidders by many companies.
In any case, having recently acquired a JLC Shark, albeit in need of some cosmetic treatment, I will sit this one out.
Conor
Let's take two example, the Master Mariner Chronometer ( I posted ) and the Mystery in 18 Ct YG Lot 42 ( I didn't post, but a marvel ).
These 2 are very rare pieces, which should have been much better documented.
How the bidder can get the importance of these 2 pieces with such a poor information?
Best,
Nicolas.
What do I have to do?
Shut my mooth?
BUT there are some true treasures to be found. This is the problem, there are to be found, when they should have been highlighted, in this " Unique " auction;
Best, my friend.
Nicolas.
When it comes to an unique auction, the glass has to be full, final point.
Less pieces, no two nor three of the same, better condition, that would have filled the bill in a better way.
How can we highlight the important from the futile, with 565 lots?
How can we defend the important pieces, the true treasures with so many pieces?
STILL, there are very important pieces to get, here.
Hance this post, even if it can't be seen as an exhaustive list of interesting pieces. There are many others!
Wish we can meet soon!
Best,
Nicolas.
and I have to agree, sometime, less (and better quality) is more...
I will be very interested in how the Polaris pan out. That RED Reverso is a beauty.
Has a Jaeger LeCoultre ever been sold with just "Jaeger" on the dial, rather than Jaeger LeCoultre or just LeCoultre?
The auction says it has a 2783 in it....an ETA based JLC??
Has it ever been spotted in a catalogue?
This message has been edited by BDLJ on 2011-11-21 23:03:22
..which I think I've seen with a pointed rather than a blunt end in other photos.
"Jaeger" only? I've seen that on the Jaeger tachos/speedos/etc, not on a watch. I suspect this is a 'Jaeger' rather than a Jaeger LeCoultre.
While the description of watches in the catalog only gives a relatively reduced, 'external' perspective on the watch (like dimensions, type of movement, reference or name, metal), and indeed doesn't tell what we members of this forum can spot in several cases (repainted dials for exemples), this is quite customary in auction houses catalogs.
The information we are interested in (such as a repainted dial, any information on the movement, potential scratches to the case or any type of malfunction) is nontheless available in the 'condition report' of each lot, which is not printed in the catalog, but can be asked individually for each lot by any prospective bidder (there is an email form to request the condition report beside each lot number in the online lots list BTW).
Now, we can regret that there are a few repainted dials in such a 'unique' auction (they should have been dismissed purely before making it to the print IMHO), but these can be spotted by seasonned collectors, and if any doubt, it is possble to have a written statement (with a guarantee) from the expert of the sale (like for any auction btw).
I have not tried it myself though, as the repainted dials I spotted were pretty obvious (I might come back on that point later if I have some time)
For example, if you were interested in one of the controversial lots such as lot N°15 or the crappy 'chocolate' memo lot 410, you could click on 'enquiry' on the link beside it http://tinyurl.com/condition-report-lot-410 and obtain a written condition report stating (at least if I were the expert incharge of the condition report) that the dial is not-professionally repainted with an artistic interpretation not consistent with any known dial version for this model.
Again, not mentioning the condition of the lots directly in the catalog is not specific to this auction, this is how these things work (although we might find it distrubing, this is the norm).
Now, when the catalog was released, we were quick to 'jump' on the several (few in regards of total number) suspicious lots with (rightful) indignation (as there had been so much expectation, and therefore some disapointment)
But as you mentionned in your post, this shouldn't cast a shadow on the whole auction, for which 95% of the lots range from 'nice' to 'truely exceptional' (and there are many many more outstanding lots than disapointing ones).
Nicolas has already pointed a few gems in a separate post, but there are so many that I guess to everybody its own (I would personnaly fall for one of the Atmos, but I fear it will be out of my reach)
I hesitate to post about these watches as it's an ongoing auction...
So no specific details...
Now when I had the chance to look into the auction catalogue more in detail - big thank you to Purist friend!
My thinking is -
Why so many watches? Especially the modern watches...
Vintage - some of the watches are in so-and-so condition.
Maybe fewer lots with higher standards would benifit the high estmates..?
Considering the high quality printing, the amount of vintage catalogues and ads in the catalogue...
I think maybe some more and/or more correct info on the watches would have been nice.
For example - the JLC DSA: ...STAINLESS STEEL WRIST WATCH WITH DATE...
With date?! Even a blind chicken can see there is no date on the watch!
Enough whining...
The good thing is that the auction shows the wide selection of vintage JLC!
A stunning lineup - just wish I would be one of the lucky winners of this auction...
Best, my friend
Blomman

Back in 2003 the same auctionhouse had a JLC 170th jubile auction with 382 lots.
Same spread of different items but much higher visual standard on the watches (don't know about the movements).
Don't know how the outcome was - but estimate of a DSA US was...
3000/5000 EUR !!
And the JLC Polaris 68 was the same...
Where is my timemachine?!
Best
Blomman
PS. Fun note - the inside cover of that catalogue (the biggest pic in the book) has a repainted black E 855...
To me, this is an aucrtion, witrh some very nice pieces, and, as usual, some crap.
Not an unique auction,, whose criterias are necessarily, naturally, more restricted.
They promised a dinner with Penelope Cruz, I ended with Josiane Balasko.
Best, and thanks a lot for your input, Marv.
Nicolas.
This message has been edited by amanico on 2011-11-24 01:51:42