...I have a polaris with a non lumen dial (the 2. edition).
I like how it looks in daylight but would love a full lumen at night. On the other hand - the full lumen dial (the first edition) looks nice in the dark but is (to me) to strange/dark in the daylight. If JLC could make a combo (as the 2. edition but with full lumen), my guess is, they would have done so with the 2. edition and i would rather have a watch that looks nice in the daylight.... To me none of the above are perfect and this is still a strange watch to me.
Would have been nice to have known this "minor detail" befor I paid for my Polaris up front - I think JLC have lost som collectors on this one. It is still strange to me that JLC can put so much time and $ into a perfect re-edition, and then throw it all awy on the dial. It is non pro and give JLC a bad rep. Strange. They must have known this problem from the start, or don´t JLC produce the dials themself?
I still hope for a combo dial but on the present 2 - I like the 2. edition best.
I still think that a more " creamy " color should have been a blast...
best,
Nicolas
...the tritium would be actively glowing. Not a faded brown.
In any case, I know what I prefer between faked patina and function.
It is a diver!
- and the mail point for the design of the dial, is the function of the lumen - so a non lumen dial make no sens to me... I would rather have a all white dial if it could all glow!
the original polaris would not glow at all with indexes with tritium. The half life of tritium is 12y, the power of the glow would be today abotu 1/16th of what it was originally.
nevertheless, the dial with not all indexes glowing as one would expect is not a good thing, I think.
does anyone know the range of the first batch in terms of s/n in the limited edition with the "fully glowing" dial?
Technically, despite the 12,5 years half life, the '68 is stil glowing after 40 years...
All right, it is only slightly glowing, but at least all the indexes do glow !
15 seconds @ 2.96875
So indeed, it is not glowing much !
Technically, the phosphor would have been used up prior to the electrons no longer being emitted from the Tritium...The output is not directly related to the degree of decay. No phosphor, no glow...
Anyway, what I meant to convey was that if one bought a new Polaris in the late 60's, the indices would not be brown.
I think JLC does care about its customers.
On this particular problem of lume on the dial, they could propose a solution or at least communicate with the customers that would want to know whether or not something can be done. I suppose it could be easy if the customers would register their tribute to polaris on the JLC website, then JLC coudl communicate directly. would this provide a solution in a form of a recall of the watches to change the dials: I doubt it, but surely this would make watchfans appreciate the brand more.
I also think that a good old fashioned letter written to the "grande maison" has a weight bigger than just a sheet of paper.
But do JLC peole franticly read every post of every dedicated forum where their brand is mentioned? I hope not.
anyway, I wish I had a tribute to Polaris on my wrist when I see all the nice pictures of wristshots of the beast.
Dear All,
Unfortunately I would have to say that JLC is not at all concerned about what we think about their decision not to change the dial. It was after all a very limited edition so they probably have considered the cost of getting it right against a few limited (less that 700) unhappy people and thought that they can live with losing a few customers if that what it came down to.
Sad but unfortunately true since the response that we have received from them to date is quite frankly an insult of the highest order. Apologies if I sound bitter but that’s a fact. I cannot accept that a company like JLC that can produce some of the most sophisticated time pieces in the world can’t get a simple thing like the lume correct. It like saying I can do vector based equations but I can’t add 1+1. I don’t buy that for one minute it is all about costs in the end.
I’ll always be happy that I am privileged to own what is still a great watch but it has definitely left a bitter perception about JLC the company. The lady that was in charge of the project aught to be ashamed that she delivered a less than perfect piece. I know I would be…….talk about snatching mediocrity from greatness.
Best
Mark S
There is no 'closest replication' acceptable if you don't get full luminous indexes... (remember: form AND function ! )
This is no excuse.
I understand that there could have been "trials and errors" in the making of this watch (especially considering this is a small batch that came to market within a relatively short time), but now that all the community of owners agree that the outcome is not exactly right, I think that offering a free upgrade (i.e. non fake-patinated, but fully glowing indexes) would be a smart move.
Not sure it will happen though.... but if JLC chosed to replace the dials (mk I and II ) by a correct one, I think it would improve brand image a lot within the true enthusiasts community (since the buyers of this very special watch are not the average Joe but are quite influential - in a positive, or negative way )