and with the benefit of hindsight what would be your first watch to start the ball rolling again? Would your style of collecting change, with more or less pieces for instance? Or are you fully satisfied with your lot right now (present collection) and wouldn't change a thing?
Hypothetical question I know but it would be interesting to see if say all the funds that you have ploughed into your current collection were freed up and you were to start from scratch; how would you proceed?
I can imagine some seasoned collectors who have through the years fine tuned their collection and acquired pieces with a lot of blood, sweat & tears not wanting to go through it all again. For the rest of us,myself included, I can imagine a lot of trial & error were involved and all too often hasty decisions may lead to regret or indiffence later. Easy way is from time to time re-evaluate what you have and make the necessary changes (disposals/acquisitions) along the way if need be.
This scenario can actually be realistically played out if say an individual, for whatever reason, disposes of his entire collection, only to start again further down the road with his/her first watch.
Would you do it if you could and your starting piece would be?
Thank you for your indulgence and looking forward to your replies.
cheers
fernando
I would have concentrated on a few Patek minute repeaters: 5078, 5074, 5016, all in platinum...presumably through auctions...plus maybe one or two independents, for instance: Dufour, Voutilainen, in other words, five watches instead of fifty. Note that they are all 'wearable', unlike PP 5002 or VC Tour de L'ile...
Yes, I know I am greedy, but as Gordon Gekko said: Greed is good :P
Best
Sam
just a wiser man.Life's too short to not live it to the full. Those 5 would be too awesome for words - it can still happen,can't it?
Thanks for your response. I can see where this is going.
Best
fernando
This message has been edited by fernando on 2011-02-05 04:18:58
you busy for a few years I imagine pplater.No beater in the lot - perhaps 1 rolex?
Thanks for your reply.
cheers
fernando

came back to my mind Horo.What a catchy tune & so relevant to this post. A nice thought if only we could 'turn back the time'.So many mistakes could have been avoided but we wouldn't be who we are now,with battle scars and all.
Cheers
fernando
Tough question, Fernando.
I think I would sum it to around 10 / 15 watches, a kind of blend of the nicest Vintage and Modern watches.
I would certainly get a selection which would look like something like this:
Panerai 6154, the epitome of strenght and elegance ala Italiana.
Tudor 7924, a brutal and very fine bad boy, and a piece of History.
Rolex 6542: The mother of all the Rolex GMTs, I never saw something more sensual than this one.
Blancpain FF ( US NAVY / Pakistanese or TR 900 ), a legend on the wrist.
AP: The very first R.O, an hybrid watch, sporty and dressy at the same time, difficult to put in words, exciting to feel.
GP: The Tourbillon with gold bridge(s): Timeless, precious, an intellectual pleasure and satisfaction.
Lange und Sohne Langematik Anniversary: One of the finest Lange ever made, and a captivating enamel dial.
JLC Master Minute Repeater: Can't get rid of it, a somptuous and crazy watch.
JLC Duometre à Chronographe, one of the smartest modern JLC.
JLC Vintage Deep Sea Alarm ( European ), a superb and curious Diving Watch.
U.N Freak, the mother of all concept watches, crazy, original, technical, a milestone.
U.N Sonata, the nicest Alarm watch combined to a friendly complication ( the GMT ) : THE treveller's watch.
PP 5110P. THE Reference in world time watches.
VC Minute Repeater skeleton: It will be the only one high complication I would double, without any hesitation, and with a great pleasure: A Masterpiece of Art.
I would also pick one Independant: De Bethune or K.V, but I still have to do my homework.
With such a list, I would say that I could not do better... I would retire without any regrets.
Best,
Nicolas.
anyone proud Nicolas.A lot of vintages I see but aren't most of them in your current collection?
Best
fernando
. Thus, i fell no need to turn back the time. Even if I can turn back the time, most probably I would keep on making mistakes, judging by the size of my brain....of THAT watch - the 'one that dare not speak its name'. No regrets???
Cheers,
pplater.
. Really, I have no regret at all. 
if I would start over again knowing what I do now, I would probably skip some of the very early watches I bought when I did not know what I like, but otherwise I would probably arrive at something pretty close to what I currently have.
If I would travel back in time four years and gave myself the money I spent on watches in the meantime, I would probabl have a very hard time convincing my former self that this could have possibly happened, and I would not be surprised if my 2007 self would prefer to buy a grand piano and put the rest towards the mortgage.
Finally, if my entire collection turned to money right now, I would probably rebuy the Resonance and the Datograph and use the rest for a big watch purchase (a Journe DS?)and then start to reacquire most of what I have now.
Best
Andreas
you have now after the big pieces is an interesting revelation Andreas. Wouldn't it be better just to maintain the status quo ? Thanks for the feedback
cheers
fernando

I guess we can all learn something from it.
cheers & thanks
fernando
The thought that immediately occurred to me was that if I were starting over again, even with the full knowledge that I have today, there are a number of pieces that I've owned that I would buy again. For me it's a matter of a journey -- one's development as a watch lover and collector.
For instance, I have owned (and sold) an Omega Speedy, a PP Aquanaut and 5015, and a Reverso Duo, and still own a JLC Memovox, a UN Monopusher chrono, a JLC Ultra-thin, and so on. Some of these are watches that I think "everyone should own" at some point, just to have the experience (for instance, the Speedy and a simple Reverso), and all of them are pieces that at the time purchased made a lot of sense -- but it's possible that as one develops over time, it gets to be time to move on to other things.
For me, I'm actually in the starting phases of such a transition. I looked for a long time for a piece that I could use as a simple daily wearer for both business and pleasure (and landed -- yesterday! -- on a VC Overseas Chrono), and now plan to sell off the majority of my less expensive watches in order to help fund the purchase of a small number of more precious pieces.
But my point is that if I hadn't owned a Memovox, for instance, and were starting out again today, I'd still want to own a Memovox at some point.
If I get to start from today and keep all of my experiences intact, would I sell my current collection and start over? Yes and no -- I would do the liquidation of part of my set of watches as described above, but I have a core set of "keepers" from both major brands and independents that I plan to keep for as long as I can.
If I were forced to sell the whole shooting match and start again, still with all experiences intact, the struggle (as usual) would be between "going big" with one landmark piece and buying what would be the first of a planned sequence of acquisitions. Going big would be something like a Duality, KV decimal repeater, or VC skeleton repeater. The portfolio play would definitely start with an Observatoire, and then there would be some other pieces in the mix including a VH Antiqua, FPJ Vagabondage, a Simplicity, and so on -- as well as re-acquisition of some of my faves from my current batch (over and above the Observatoire) including the AP EOT and Reverso repeater.
Enough from me!
Best,
Gary G