








Thanks a lot for your nicely pictured presentation of your 2 watches.
Somehow you feel a certain inclination towards reasonably priced, good qualitiy German watches, as you recently posted a photo of the Sinn U1.
I also like Stowa watches and hold the Antea 365 with a plain ETA 2824-2 movement which is a pleasure to wear and look at, as it was given a nice finish by the STOWA people.
They (the watches, not the folks at STOWA) are probably not horological "haute cuisine", but who would like to have oysters and caviar on a day-to-day basis?
My best regards,
anaesdoc


P.S. Tried to upload my STOWA Antea pic, but it didn´t work ?!
My fault or server trouble (just followed the uploader recommendations)?

i have a couple of watches with these movements. i think they are great and would happily buy a watch with these movements in. to me they are the hand wind equivelant of the ETA 2824. some companies are even altering them to adopt a centre second. i think Stowa are doing it with their Fleiger pilots watch. they wind very smoothly and easily, maintain excellent time, and the watches are a decent but managable size.
some companies finish them better than others, but thats another post still running
6497


6498


best
Graham
two very nice looking watches too. I especially like the Archer. I think it is much nicer if contemporary big watches contain a similarly sized movement!
Best
Andreas
...Stowa, particularly the screwed balance and the swan-neck.
For some reason, I have never liked blued screws. They tend to overwhelm the relatively subdued colours of the balance, train and jewels - and instead draw attention to 'mundane' components.
Daos,
I found myself in the position of wanting a "marriage watch" (Taking a pocket watch and casing it into a wristwatch) and the Unitas 6497 prove to be the best choice for this experiment, which in the end turned out to be more like a stroll to my AD rather than a self driven, self guided project to achieve something that would have never come out as nice as this:

Reliability, low maintenance, and finishing flexibility are also great virtues, which is why I think the 6497 / 6498 is so popular among producers, and better yet, collectors.
Cheers,
Alex
The more and more I look at the Archer watch, the more I get the feeling that the watch lacks an identity. When pictures were first posted here on this site, it looked like very interesting watch but after closer inspection, the watch seems like it's "confused". I use the word "confused" because the dial and hands resemble Breguet, the crown resembles Chronoswiss, and the lugs resembles Speake-Marin. There's no Archer name on the dial and this perpetuates the ambiguity even more.
At least with the Stowa, it has its own distinguisable look, but the Archer lacks any cohesion IMO since it's a combination of many looks from various brands. I know a fellow PuristS makes these Archer watches, and I commend him in his new profession but I want to suggest to him to give his watches more identity so people can bond with them more.
Thanks once again for the comparison of the Stowa and Archer!
- Anthony


the 6497/98 movements are great to modify, masters like Dornbluth or Ninchritz make beautiful 3/4 plate conversions, also the specials by Habring and the engraved skeleton watches by Benzinger are truly work of art.
These simple and reliable calibers were my obvious choice to base the design on, when I decided to try and make a movement with "classic" looks:
the nr.1, which is ticking away in my daily watch for several months now:
a few movements (unfinished) to try out different styles and details:
Some more recent watches based on 6498 (left) and 6497 (right), movements still completely rough, no decoration yet:
Probably I should get on with finishing and decorating the mov 'ts, get them plated, order the custom dials etc.......... but my attention span is very short and there are still a lot of other ideas I want to try: like this new project (also based on a 6498) in it's very first stage:
more later (perhaps).......................
Paul
