
was the specifics - with such explicit specifics, it too easily leads readers to assume or expect that level of service, which
1. is simply unrealistic as a matter of course
2. is directly contradictory to mine (I like that master independent very much, as you very well know, and was trying very hard not to name him specifically in my horrible experiences. But as a matter of standards - I will counter weigh extreme negativity - I feel a need now to offer my specific experiences, since you did, as a "counter weight"...
See my dilemma?
Thanks for understanding.
TM
If they (or their watch) lets you down, you feel it even more.
Thanks!
Andrew
My experience directly contradicts CL's, twice.
In many cases, with indies or with brands, I've had to call the SAV director or CEO; I shouldn't have to.
Cheers,
TM
knowing new women just because MAYBE,in the future we MIGHT fall out of love or SHE might cheat on us?
C mon,I dissent from my friend Nico,and to an extent to Thomas(mind you I am new in the game so I didn t have to go through the SAV nightmares he is been going through so I am still unscarred and innocent).....but......
Should I deprive myself of an extreme pleasure just because one day I might not be able to...bla bla....life is too short and we all buy watches for pleasure..if they will retain value etc good, but most of all,it is this instant pleasure I need to satisfy....definitely the money I spend on a watch is not the last batch I have, nor I put myself in debt to buy a timepiece,...so with spare money one satisfies his passions,could be women,drugs or....in this case watches.....IF THAT indipendent has a product that makes me go weak and dreamy,well, I will go for it,,,the future?Who cares,that is not the only watch I own anyway and If I will lose that money because Indipendent X doesn t exist anymore or noone can service it(I doubt it...)well...be it..If I want to make an investment I buy an apartment or a piece of land....
Bottom line is LOVE,,if I fall in love with something and I have the means to get it I will....
"I would love that starry sky De Bethune,,it makes me dream,,,,,but I opted for a Patek at the end as it s more sensible purchase".....F£$K that!i will never be that guy.......By the way everybody says that with an Indi you buy the man not the brand....with my experience with De Bethune I bought the brand(AMAZING) and the men behind it,,,men of their own words and with lots of guts,they have my respect and admiration and I bet everything I have that they will take care of me when in need......
Mo
This message has been edited by moc on 2011-02-02 00:46:34 This message has been edited by moc on 2011-02-02 00:48:25
And sorry to hear of your bad experiences Thomas.
My experiences have also been positive. I've had a few problems - and have received a level of prompt and personal service I could never have expected from a major brand. I also have a watch where I expect this would not be the case were I to have problems.
On a used piece where you may not have met the maker, servicing can even be an excuse to meet the maker.
Some of this clearly depends on the size of the company - and as Mo says - the attitude and attention of the person at the top.
One of my more unusual and 'risky' pieces with the first run of a new movement even has a lifetime guarantee from the maker!
That aside I think the whole industry (not just independents) have a problem with some of the most complex pieces, where the computer models work fine - but in the metal there are tolerance and production quality issues which can cause problems. Runs are not high enough - and devlopment times too short for these problems to be found before shipping.
We all know of major brands having these problems as well as independents (sometimes you suspect that some complex pieces have never been regularly worn and just don't work on the wrist).
As Mo says - buy the maker- and have a realistic view that servicing a complex piece can take a lot of work which one must expect to pay for - esp if you are not the first owner.
And to add to Mo's thinking, I've just bought a used piece from a major brand that where I gather there were some problems - but it's just so interesting...
- Greg
unless the watch has an extremely unconventionnal movement or parts. Today we have watchmakers who can service watches made 50, 100 or 200 years ago by makers who no longer exist so I can't really see this being different for independent makers.
story for you.
A friend of mine owned the Rolex chrono below which was bought in the 40s by her father and passed down to her. The watch in the early 2000 was in a sorry state and she took it to Rolex for servicing and they refused as the watch was too old and they didn't have parts. I suggested an independent watchmaker who could service the watch and after close to a year the watch came back in superb condition.
So yes we still have capable watchmakers/repairers who can still repair and restiore watches made by the likes of Golay Meylan, Janvier, Berthoud or Leroy.
On the other hand I'm not sure that if you have a Graham, Thompion, Lemania you can actually take it to the eponymous brand to have them
serviced
All this to say that down the line these independet watchmakers are...well ...watchmakers and their watches have been constructed and developed with servicing in mind and all you need down the road is to find a good watchmaker who could service your watch even if its maker/brand is retired, bust or dead.
Imagine my U.N Freak is dead...
Do you think any other brand than U.N can repair it?
I totally agree with you if we have to service movements with a classic construction, but what if they become too complex, too specific?
Do you still think any watch maker, even a very good one, can service or repair it?
I still rememer the example of the GG Grande complication that nobody wanted to service and repair, at a certain time.
If I remember the stroy correctly, I tjink it ended in the hands of a JLC watchmaker, but nobody wanted to repair it...
Interesting discussion, by the way.
"the watch has an extremely unconventionnal movement or parts". The Freak could be an issue because it uses silicium (silicon?) components.
You hit the nail on the head in your reply, servicing can be an issue for all brands not just independents.
Another funny story I had an issue with a watch from a very well known brand and they never got it straight, and I had it looked at by Sarpaneva who fixed it in no time....
Seriously, I feel that the topic of the Service, a quallity and reliable service, will be the " nerf de la guerre " in the very next years, and that a severe selection may happen very fast.
Yes, the Freak uses silicon for its dual escapement.
I fear the moment when I will send it for a service...
Best,
Nicolas.
lets have fun with watches without speculating too much,,,the future?????Anything can happen but I can t worry about what is not an issue now....now I have other things to worry about..like finding the founds for my next watch............ha ha..
Mo
reply to Amanico!
On the other hand which are the independent watchmakers who use Silicon in their watches? I'm not refering to DeBethine as I consider them a brand and not an independent maker.




and PassionS ...without them almost no worth living......
Well visually put Oliver......
Mo
and you see all that translate into a beautiful piece, sublime. because it is about integrity. and how far a person is able to go with it and put himself on the dial.
With indepedents, the risk is part of the romance. And I would also factor in the possibility of temperament being that these guys are artists.
I'm WILLING to spend for one regardless of future issues but it's really just that I can't afford it.
Geez, almost like a marriage.
I wish marriages were more like Rolexes
To be able to meet the watchmaker which adds a soul to the watch....
It is not just buying a watch but it is all the communication, travelling, meeting .... the whole experiene which is facinating





