





... but it comes at the service costs of a full grown mechanical movement. ;-)
I just had the invoice for the first service of my wife’s Twenty4 on my desk – wow!
Though I have to admit, that the watch is simply beautiful - well designed und crafted.
An excellent gift, Luis!
Christian
And yes, comparing absolute numbers for the service charge of quarz v mechanical movements my statement is obviously wrong. But it was not the absolute numbers that I was aiming at.
I was and am still wondering, why the service of a quarz movement made of 57 parts cost about 550 CHF while the service of let’s say a cal. 215 made of 130 parts costs only about 700 CHF. The difference in the number of parts is roughly 125%, while the service costs rise for a mere 25%. Assuming that at least half of the costs are related to disassembling and reassembling the movement - as this takes valuable watchmakers time - the difference in the number of parts should result into a much greater difference in service costs.
Does the pricing still make sense to you? To me it does not.
Cheers,
Christian
"
Dear Oliver,
Apart from Patek stating on their site:
The price of the service varies depending on the complexity of the timepiece.
both of us can indeed just make assumptions on how the prices are calculated in detail.
I did not intend to complain about the absolut numbers. I intended to vent my puzzlement about the pricing as I coincidentally just had picked up my wife’s Twenty4 from service. Besides: my puzzlement originated in the fact that the service would comprise a testing of power reserve according to the cost estimate. ;-) My trusted AD explained that with the use of text modules.
Regarding trusted ADs I can confirm your experience: getting battery changes done on my wife’s watches as my contribution to family life I cannot remember to have ever been asked to pay for it by my AD – though I do ask what I should pay of course!
Have a nice weekend,
Christian
