WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Automotive

Yet to spend some serious time with this one :)

 
 By: KMII : September 6th, 2017-11:40
But your ode to it is quite promising!

ahh the hachi-roku....I was toying with the idea of getting this car (used) or the new rolex day date.

 
 By: kesharoo : September 6th, 2017-20:41
whichever it is, the car will be a manual one of course. Lets see....Have to test drive them and decide between the 86 or the BRZ.

'86 all the way. :-) [nt]

 
 By: Velociphile - No longer in the building : September 7th, 2017-00:35
No message body

A perfect concept, but with a few flaws...

 
 By: patrick_y : September 7th, 2017-14:49
When the Toyota 86 debuted, I applauded Toyota for bringing this to market.  This is exactly what the industry needed.  

Then I drove one, a stock one, for nearly 1000 miles, 1500 kilometers, and I couldn't sing its praises anymore.  Drove it in heavy Los Angeles traffic, in the city, on windy roads with WanteringPurist and other sports car fans, on a road trip, and so on.  

Conceptually, the car was excellent.  But its execution did have a few flaws.  Perhaps, I got an unlucky one that slipped past quality control.  The Limited Slip Differential clunked on any sharp turns, and clunked heavily in a U-turn.  The acceleration needed careful and precise planning on the highway.  The car didn't qualify as a momentum car because the car's handling couldn't keep a turn at speed.  The Hyundai Genesis two door coupe drove like a better sorted car. 

In the end, it brought exposure to a niche that was underserved.  It sold reasonably well, but apparently the small number that was sold is such a small percentage of the entire product portfolio that Toyota doesn't care.  It's also targeting a market that won't pay for the product; it's too expensive for the people asking for the product (it's kind of like the people who clamor for Ferrari to make more manual stick shifts; those clamor-ers aren't buyers), and for the people who can afford the product they go for something a little bit bigger, like the heavier Lexus IS and RC, the Infiniti Q60 coupe (which wins on looks alone), and the German coupes.  

A BMW 2011 or 2012 -year 328i coupe with the 3.0 liter naturally aspirated engine is my choice in this segment.  Great steering, good brakes, fantastic handling, and I'll take it in automatic or the comfort-oriented manual.  Just gotta watch out for that electric water pump on that generation of 28i engine as they fail  randomly and cause the entire engine to overheat.  Did I mention it also doesn't have a coolant temperature gauge?  Talk about flaws!  

Interesting insight

 
 By: Velociphile - No longer in the building : September 8th, 2017-05:16
Not sure what bias ratio was chosen but this torsen is 'tight' in full lock turns. Also the rear brakes activate to control the 'slipping' wheel if needed when this happens on looser surfaces. This can feel clunky but is normal.
Not sure what tyres you had but the stock grip is deliberately 'low' exposing the driver to the handling earlier. Sadly the knife edge breakaway of the Primacy's (especially when cold/winter) were not Tada's choice but a corporate greenwash one ("look our new sportscar has the same tyres as our Prius", along with production economy of scale), he preferring the equal grip but more progressive Yoko DB70s. The car is very responsive to different corner entry techniques, yielding understeer with a gentle turn rate up to immediate roll oversteer for the trail braker or those with more aggressive wheel work. I think the problem is 99% of potential buyers just don't get any of this and can buy a faster, easier to drive car for a lot less. It is certainly overpriced, fortunately the poor sales meant phat discounts were easy to come by. I think the problem Toyota has with it now is that everyone who wanted one now has one.
Nice choice with the 328, but that's a completely different beast, old school six and 400ish kg heavier for a start smile Credit to BMW though, they design their cars to handle first and use the DSC second unlike some brands I could mention.
Velociphile

I definitely had one with the bad tires...

 
 By: patrick_y : September 8th, 2017-16:35
I had one with touring tires, Michelins if I recall correctly. I was rather surprised that the tires had such limited grip.
My normal car has Michelin Pilot Super Sport tires; so that's my baseline.
But the Toyota 86 is definitely a great concept and we need to applaud Tada for bringing the concept to light.
Now, where's a nice E92 328i... I've had a V8 powered BMW and a V8 powered AMG. But I still fondly want that 328i E92 Coupe. It oddly crosses my mind as fondly as a Lamborghini Huracan does.

"limited grip"

 
 By: Velociphile - No longer in the building : September 9th, 2017-01:32
Hi Patrick, If your baseline is Mich Pilot SS then I understand. 8-) That is a whopping amount of stick.
I'm less fussed about that, the thing I am always looking for is progression. The Primacys just don't seem to have that in the damp and cold UK especially. I like less outright grip though for more achievable smiles. Some of the greatest fun I've had was a BMW 540 V8 (manual!) running on Mud and snow tyres in the summer. Low grip, super progressive, lower speed overall.
I'm a Huracan fan too (2wd)
Velo

E39 BMW?

 
 By: patrick_y : September 11th, 2017-12:25
540 V8 BMW?  I personally really enjoyed the way the E39 generation of BMW 5er vehicles drove.  They were a great balance of comfort and sportiness, and a bit more on the sporty side.  

I had an E60 BMW 545i, a vehicle that was another good balance of comfort and sportiness, with a little bit greater comfort emphasis compared to the E39.  The E60 545i I drove had a myraid of comfort oriented features such as Active Steering (variable steering ratio) and Dynamic Drive (active hydraulic roll bar suspension) that increased the capability of the car's handling but numbed out some of the feel - it took me over a month to get used to it and about six months of driving to start loving it.  I consider the E39 and the E60 the best BMW 5ers.  I have just spent some time driving the latest 540i (the brand new model) which is an I6 engine - seems promising.  

I've had much more experience in the AWD Huracan, probably around 20 times the mileage in the AWD version than the RWD version.  I'd love to get some more seat time in the Huracan, but the blind spot, smallest-in-its-class trunk, and the smallest-in-its class cabin is annoying.  Otherwise, I imagine it to be the most reliable and easy to drive of the twocompetitors (Ferrari 458/488 and McLaren 650S/720S).  McLaren owners tell me that the McLaren is shockingly smooth and easy to drive once you get used to it.  The biggest problem with the Huracan is the blind spot...  You simply cannot execute an emergency lane change in the Huracan because you can't see what's in the other lane.  I'm told that the McLaren coupes have a much more manageable blind spot, so I'm curious about the McLaren now.  

What are your thoughts about the McLaren 12C/650S?  I saw the 720S at Quail and was mightily impressed!  

Funny the cars we are talking about in the same thread as GT86.....

 
 By: Velociphile - No longer in the building : September 13th, 2017-11:01
2-10x the price and 1.5 - 3.5x the power.....
Patrick, I guess it all depends on what you're looking for. You're lucky to have the problem. At these levels I think it is hairsplitting differences as to whatever floats your boat. I am very driven by the driving aesthetics not metrics, so I will have to give the McL a low score for its ongoing lacklustre exhaust note - I could not live with it - we all hated it when working on 12C and a better sounding exhaust was not chosen at sign off; though it has improved. It's such a fundamental part of the experience when driving. For example why I have Zx1000R (screaming raspy hair tingling sound) not a Fireblade (vaccum cleaner).
Life is too short to compromise, and I'm biased towards the lovely people holding the torch at Sant'Agata, who I dearly miss, (blub blub) so LP580-2 all the way for Velociphile, not that I could afford to squeeze that in the garage past MrsV.
but we'd probably all be better off in a NSX.... hehehe

Good to know about the McLaren...

 
 By: patrick_y : September 14th, 2017-11:58
I'll have to pay attention to that.  It's a flat crank V8 built by Ricardo, it shouldn't sound too bad.  There's also a Sport Exhaust optional extra.  

I recall the Aston Martin V12 Vantage S, it had an amazing sound and amazing looks.  Unfortunately not much else.  Wasn't great at handling in the corners, wasn't comfortable, wasn't exceptionally smooth riding, but you were actively engaged to the driving experience due to the sound.  I admittedly did make an offer to lease one for two years.  

The biggest fault with the Huracan I find is the blind spot when changing lanes.  Visibility to the sides and the rear is just too limited for me to drive confidently and in safety.  I've driven the AWD Huracan dozens of times, and while I was always enthralled by the experience, I was always a little wary and worried about the blind spots.  Never got used to it neither.  I'd have to try it again.  But the Huracan is my favorite of the three mid-engined vehicles.  Driving the Huracan in Sport Mode with the sport exhaust and hearing the little crackles in the exhaust when you lift off...  Just bliss!


"Flat crank V8....." "...shouldn't sound bad"

 
 By: Velociphile - No longer in the building : September 19th, 2017-12:02
Well it may have been designed, engineered and developed by the unsung Ricardo, but the customer, MCL, still chose the sound.
Don't let the Huracan's so called blindspot put you off. Spread the mirrors wider than usual.