WatchProSite|Market|Digest

Montblanc

Thanks for shiming in, tick talk.

 
 By: amanico : September 19th, 2013-07:04

It's a reasonable topic.

 
 By: MichaelC : September 20th, 2013-07:44
I do read you, and I know how you feel about the date.  And I can think of a good handful of watches I would like better if they omitted the date.

But for many of us, the date function is a good inclusion, so they key is doing it discreetly or perhaps better said in a way that does not detract from the rest of the dial.  This Montblanc certainly goes about it correctly, and perhaps even enhances the design (and we probably cannot say that about too many date functions).

Thanks Nicolas, good thread here.

The form and the function. The recipe is simple, and tough to obtain.

 
 By: amanico : September 20th, 2013-08:10

Hats off to the Montblanc designers on that one, indeed.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us, my friend.

Best,

Nicolas

Usually a date has no place!

 
 By: patrick_y : September 24th, 2013-09:23
I love dates.  In fact, I need dates.  But the problem that commonly arises is the same problem you project Nico.  The date looks ugly.  And on certain watches, for instance the Patek Philippe 5070, all of the Montblanc Villerets, and some really classic pieces, a date really has no place!  

But today, you've really identified a watch, where the date is very well integrated into the dial of the watch.  I hadn't given this a whole lot of thought on the Rieussec, but you're right, the way Montblanc integrated the date on this one is very elegant.  No unnecessary arperture interrupting the dial.  This date is well integrated.  


Inegrated, this is the word. A big part of the charm of this watch.

 
 By: amanico : September 25th, 2013-12:04

Thanks for chiming in, my friend.

Best,

Nicolas