JFT
1210
So....
Back while I was in SG, I got a chance to encounter this pretty piece....
First sedna gold creation by omega (?)
Please don't mind with the plastic 
But I think, something was lacking here... And I found out that its dial is using the ol' fav classic constellation pie pan model with that minute indexes inside, while it uses the long minute and second hand which is pretty much off IMHO...
Or... Is it better in this way? (sorry for the poor editing, it's done with my phone's sketch app :p)
HAGWE!
Jev
So....
Back while I was in SG, I got a chance to encounter this pretty piece.... First sedna gold creation by omega (?) Please don't mind with the plastic But I think, something was lacking here... And I found out that its dial is using the ol' fav classic const...
Better . . .
. . . your way, Jeviar! The character of the indexes is enhanced when they're not obscured by minute and second hands. Art ...
Yep but somehow this design in this "2009" constellation just didn't fit as well to accommodate the design of 1960es...
Perhaps due to that massive bezel? Best Jev
Your version is...
nice but the hands seems to lose a little of its presence on the dial. It is neat to have the hands not covering the indices but they do look smallish. I would go for the as designed version. Really love the color of the Sedna gold - more warm. /W72
Yeah, I think due to the massive bezel with that roman numeral engravings as well...
It does look like it's lost.... Perhaps it would look better with those minute/second railtracks were placed outside those 12 gold indexes, like the cal. 561 I've previously posted here.... Anyway, thanks for your input Best Jev