pmontoyap
5
Re: MMMhhh
Hi Franco,
Thanks for your input, you´re correct I meant the 165.024 no date dial. I got it new old stock so I´d rather not touch them. The point is I need the triangular markers ala 14755 so a relume will no be enough. It will have to be painted from scratch with the smaller traigular markers and thicke, closed numerals. I´m in the process of sending Aldo a couple of bezels for restoration will certainly inquire about a refinished 14755 dial, but like you said he is known for relumes not necessarilly redials. I have seem some pretty good jobs here and there, I´d consider the following a very acceptable 300 redial, what do you think:
14755 dial refinish, who would you recommend?
Good day everyone! I´m a newbie here, I inadvertedly posted this in the Horological Meandering forum, so here it is again. Got my hands on a 14755 project watch, its has very nice case and movement, Luckily I have the arrow hands as well. The only issue i...
MMMhhh ..
... the 166.024 dial that you mention would have a date aperture which would not suit a 14755. If it is 165.024 dial, I would get that relumed by somebody like Aldo in Italy, rather than having one redialled fom scratch. A 165.024 dial could be washed of ...
Re: MMMhhh
Hi Franco, Thanks for your input, you´re correct I meant the 165.024 no date dial. I got it new old stock so I´d rather not touch them. The point is I need the triangular markers ala 14755 so a relume will no be enough. It will have to be painted from scr...
Ok
Hi well, certainly Aldo does not do redials .... but I repeat, nobody does good redials of SM300 dials. The one you show, pardon me, is horrible. The Omega symbol is totally wrong, The lume has been given with with some gross imprecisions. Plus the whole ...
you'll have a hard job getting a 14755 dial
especially an old one being sold on. perhaps would have been better with the original one in whatever the condition as now your watch just looks like a later 165.014 with a new dial. as this model can be bought significantly cheaper than a 14755 putting t...