Nice Work, Hans!

Dec 28, 2009,20:21 PM
 

I'm curious if there are any pictures of the casebacks on those Geneve Dynamic Models with the caliber 560.

I've come across a couple of cal. 560's in case reference number 14470, which I think is the predecessor to 166.0020.  These all seem to date from around 1961-62, with the 2 adjustments. I have some pictures which are too large to publish here.  Please send me a PM or e-mail and I can provide them.

Excellent research, and I learned that my watch is in fact the KL6312"H" with the GF engraving on the inside of teh caseback:

Thanks again,

gatorcpa

 

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Calibre 560 For the US market

 
 By: hans_jorgen_1968 : December 28th, 2009-16:06
The calibre 560 was a 17 Jewel calibre only produced in 3000pcs for the US market. The calibre has been produced from 1959, but has been used in models for the US market mainly marketed between 1963-1967 Serial numbers between 16-23 mill Variants The foll...  

Nice Work, Hans!

 
 By: gatorcpa : December 28th, 2009-20:21
I'm curious if there are any pictures of the casebacks on those Geneve Dynamic Models with the caliber 560. I've come across a couple of cal. 560's in case reference number 14470, which I think is the predecessor to 166.0020. These all seem to date from a...  

Thanks gatorcpa

 
 By: hans_jorgen_1968 : December 28th, 2009-23:20
Hi gatorcpa Also thanks to your comment here, and previosly as well during my research. Thankyou for sharing your picture on a really nice dial. I originally wanted to postpone this post to include the case back of the Dynamic (need to take a decent pictu... 

I'm astounded by the clear caseback variation, even if it . . .

 
 By: Dr No : December 28th, 2009-21:53
. . . wasn't commercially available . . . perhaps it was a demonstrator model for dealers. Thanks so much, Hans . . . very much appreciated! Cordially, Art

Thankyou Art

 
 By: hans_jorgen_1968 : December 28th, 2009-23:50
According to Desmonds article, it could be a salesman type / demonstration type (it most probably is, as the water tightness does not exist with the clear back, hence the corroded dial). However I confronted the Omega Museum with the question, but they di... 

Very interesting post, Hans!

 
 By: amanico : December 28th, 2009-23:54
Wow, my friend, that's a superb post! for those, like me, who don't really know this topic, and certainly fro all the others, it is a rerally useful work. Thanks a lot! Best, Nicolas

Thanks my friend :-)

 
 By: hans_jorgen_1968 : December 29th, 2009-00:05
Hello my friend It is a nice topic, and one of the more unkown. The official information that exist is very limited. So the digging and exchanging information is the fun part. Well, back to the mounting of the parabolic disc on my summerhouse. And tonight... 

Doing your homework is really pleasant, indeed.

 
 By: amanico : December 29th, 2009-00:08
But you're teasing me right now... I see 2 brands you could go for: Rolex and JLC... Am I right? Which one? Best, Nicolas This message has been edited by amanico on 2009-12-29 00:09:39

yes I am...

 
 By: hans_jorgen_1968 : December 29th, 2009-00:54
.... something red... Best Hans

thanks Hans, lots of information that is not available at the touch of a button

 
 By: G99 : December 29th, 2009-02:55
i didnt intend to put you under pressure , but you can add the dynamic caseback at a later date. one thing we'll probably never be able to get is numbers cased in CH and in which cases. my understanding is that the VAST majority of movements went uncased ... 

Thankyou Mr Pressure

 
 By: hans_jorgen_1968 : December 29th, 2009-09:17
.... No worries. I also need to dig a little more into the steelvariants. I am not sure if they are more rare than the others. I believe they are all rare. But for sure the majority went uncased to US. I am collecting figures for my own statistic on what ... 

Was a pleasure Stefan :-)

 
 By: hans_jorgen_1968 : January 3rd, 2010-09:15