Harry2
2102
I would wager that it doesn't.
Jan 28, 2017,13:48 PM
The dial would also have to be soft iron, and a ring around the movement. As I understand it.
Comments:
view entire thread
Oh my !!!
By: nilomis : January 28th, 2017-07:34
An original Railmaster. Hard to locate one that's more cool. Cheers, Nilo
Now that you mention it
By: Harry2 : January 28th, 2017-09:29
+1 What can I say, I\'m not a chronograph guy! Plus I like soft iron inner cases.
I would wager that it doesn't.
By: Harry2 : January 28th, 2017-13:48
The dial would also have to be soft iron, and a ring around the movement. As I understand it.
Much more solid construction:
By: HSTE : January 28th, 2017-14:43
..the movement was copper finished and protected by a special double case and iron dust cover. The dial was 1mm thick as opposed to the usual 0.4mm Cheers, HSTE
You can bet on it! . . .
By: Dr No : January 28th, 2017-13:58
. . . we're just months, if not weeks, away from the announcement. Art
:D [nt]
By: Harry2 : January 28th, 2017-15:03
Hmmmm, tough one. I agree that the 2914 is one of those watches....
By: HSTE : January 28th, 2017-10:17
.....that you need to hold in your hands to appreciate it. On the other hand I am quite a chrono-guy so the 2915 is a bit of a chrono grail to me. Which is probably why I have both so that I can switch depending on mood as I did this afternoon from 2915-1...
Oct 1st, 1957? Meet . . .
By: Dr No : January 28th, 2017-10:15
. . . Sept 30th, 1957. Could be fraternal twins separated by either side of midnight. ...
A beauty
By: nacho217 : January 28th, 2017-10:35
Congratulations