Hi

Dec 23, 2012,10:11 AM
 

I would be suspicious.

Ref. 14704 is a normal Seamaster with a cal. 591 movement.

So nothing is correct on this watch, dial shold be a Seamaster dial and movement a 591 and not a 552.

If the cal. 552 should be correct for the version for the North American railroad companies the ref. should be ST 165.001. There were also two other versions with cal. 562 (ref. ST166.002) and cal. 550 (ref. ST165.002)

Best

Thomas

This message has been edited by tdn.dk on 2012-12-23 10:27:32


More posts: Seamaster

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Opinion on this Omega RailRoad Wristwatch..

 
 By: WatchCrazy : December 23rd, 2012-09:01
Like to take this opportunity to wish everyone in the forum Happy Holidays and a happy new year. I need your expert comment on this Omega RailRoad watch. The dial is a dead gorgeous one and is mint. Did Omega ever issue this one in automatic movement? I t...  

Hi

 
 By: tdn.dk : December 23rd, 2012-10:11
I would be suspicious. Ref. 14704 is a normal Seamaster with a cal. 591 movement. So nothing is correct on this watch, dial shold be a Seamaster dial and movement a 591 and not a 552. If the cal. 552 should be correct for the version for the North America... 

My suspicious is confirmed.

 
 By: WatchCrazy : December 23rd, 2012-10:58
Thanks Thomas for your quick and knowledge filled response. I really appreciated it. John

Hi

 
 By: trangntran.10 : February 4th, 2014-13:50
Hi, Wondering what you ended up doing with this watch? I think I am looking at the same one from a seller in Toronto, Canada. Cheers, Amy Tran