loveomega
22
Omega Seamaster caliber 352
Hi all,
Do you think this Omega Seamaster caliber 352 look all original?
I wonder if Seamaster model also comes with black-dial like this?
Thanks,
Lifestyle
Cazalea shares his Walks with Watches series, reflecting on weather and timekeeping. Explore his collection and adventures, including an early Bell & Ross.
8 replies1117840 views
Community
Cazalea's '77 Walks With Seikos' summary: a unique project blending watch collecting with outdoor exploration. Revisit the journey.
15 replies254617 views
Review
Amanico's hands-on review of the JLC Tribute To Deep Sea Alarm. Explore its history, unique alarm complication, and comparison to vintage diver watches.
262 replies211264 views
Vintage
In-depth review of the Rolex Explorer II Ref. 1655 'Freccione' by amanico, exploring its history, design, and market evolution. Essential reading for collectors.
123 replies153022 views
Reference Guide
Explore Jaeger-LeCoultre's diving watch history, from the rare Memovox Deep Sea Alarm to the iconic Polaris. An in-depth guide on JLC's dive watch legacy.
111 replies82413 views
Vintage
Uncover the true history of the Omega Speedmaster and its NASA connection. KIH's article features Omega Museum Manager Petros Protopapas, challenging common myths.
101 replies69789 views
Omega Seamaster caliber 352
Hi all, Do you think this Omega Seamaster caliber 352 look all original? I wonder if Seamaster model also comes with black-dial like this? Thanks,...
Looks to be...
Hi, Looks to be a ref 2520 - yes they came with black dials and the watch looks legit - as far as it can be judged by the (not so clear) pictures. Try to make better scans and include some of the "interior" regards erich
The dial is wrong.
Hi LoveOmega. I think the dial comes from a newer watch and redone in wrong style. _The OMEGA should be printed in ink. _The logo should have round edges. _Chronometer should end with TRE not TER. _Hands are a bit too long. Best. Hoi.
Black, yes. This
No. I would help to see inside for ref and cal number, but regardless the dial is grossly wrong on several fronts that Hoi has already pointed out. I would doubt that it actually is a chronometer absence of more information.