WatchProSite

Omega

Ah I imagined you had them in hand

Dec 22, 2020,14:19 PM
 

It's a nice one

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

35 mm of pure beauty. Omega Ref 2400 and 2639.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-00:10
These " small " time only Omega are ultra charming. Ref 2400: Ref 2639: Credit pictures: Brevetwatches. Everything is lovely, here. At the point I have no favorite among them. You? Best, Nicolas ...  

They are all yummy! First one if I would have to pick one! Thanks for sharing my friend!!

 
 By: agyzace : December 22nd, 2020-01:15

1 for the first. Thanks, Alexandros.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-04:44

Third one for me please. Gorgeous and elegant. Regards Kev.

 
 By: kev09 : December 22nd, 2020-01:49

And one for the third... Which I really like a lot.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-04:45

What is the dial material on #3 amanico?

 
 By: rrregulator : December 22nd, 2020-11:44

You mean the lume? Most probably radium.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-11:51

Underneath, is the black ring lacquered?

 
 By: rrregulator : December 22nd, 2020-12:32

Aaaah, that I don't know, I would have to see them in the real. I would say varnish rather than lacquer.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-13:53

Ah I imagined you had them in hand

 
 By: rrregulator : December 22nd, 2020-14:19
It's a nice one

No, not yet, alas.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-14:50

All look really nice. I fance the second one.

 
 By: @lberti : December 22nd, 2020-02:51

Tie! Thanks, Alberti.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-04:45

Id take the second for its military touch. Lovely.

 
 By: Reuven Malter : December 22nd, 2020-03:00

2 for the second. 1 for the two others.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-04:45

Always been something that attracted me. #3 for me please.

 
 By: Jay (Eire) : December 22nd, 2020-04:16

2 for the second, 2 for the third, one for the first. Thanks, Jay.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-04:46

The 3rd one would be my favorite. I am not a big fan of these smaller case but oh boy I do love their dial!

 
 By: Chronometer (aka yacomino) : December 22nd, 2020-04:46

3 for the Third! Thanks, Chronometer.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-04:59

All super charming!

 
 By: blau : December 22nd, 2020-05:53
#1 for me (if I had to choose)

3 for the 3rd, 2 for the others. Thanks for voting, my friend.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-11:50

Excellent trio!

 
 By: BigAppleBill : December 22nd, 2020-08:31
I love the syringe handsets, number 1’s being the best in my mind. But number 3’s dial makes it my overall choice.

And 4 for the 3rd! Thanks mon ami.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-11:51

2nd one for me 👍

 
 By: holdemchamp1225 : December 22nd, 2020-13:09

4 for the 3rd, 3 for the 2d and 2 for the first. Thanks, J.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-13:52

Ref 2400 came in so many dial variations . . .

 
 By: Dr No : December 22nd, 2020-17:48
. . . it's hard to say how many exist. I believe they were delivered exclusively to the Swedish agent in the '40s, some of which ended up as service watches for the Swedish military. Ref 2383, incidentally, was identical to ref 2400 but offered to other (...  

Sublime, Thomas' one.

 
 By: amanico : December 22nd, 2020-23:28