Hororgasm[PuristSPro Moderator]
7545
Kinda arbitrary excercise
Don't know your existing collection, nor what your preferences are. And the 3 watches are not commonly referenced and compared against, I assume 1) u r inclined to the 306, since you r posting this question on Pam thread. 2) Price range they are not too similar, but I suspect you r thinking of throwing your resources into one of them, to the exclusion of the other two.
So buy the 306!!! Make sure u get a seriously good discount. That watch is hard to move, even ADs was offering better than normal discount for this piece. The T3 n 5960 is relatively easy to get, but the 306 is arguably more difficult to procure.
Good luck and look forward to your final choice.
Here are my choices
By: AnthonyTsai : October 17th, 2010-16:03
Of those watches, my 1st choice would be the Patek PP5960 in platinum. Then followed by the PAM306 and lastly the AP T3. The T3, it's HUGE. I used to own one and wore it all the time but eventually sold it because its huge size didn't suit my 6.75" wrist....
Easy for me
By: P@trick@Belgium : October 18th, 2010-00:36
I go along with Anthony, first the 5960PP - 306 Pam - T3 also a bit for the same reason. I'm not a classic watch guy, but this summer i had the occasion to try on a 5960PP with the blue dial and i was sold in second .... only my bankmanager prohibeted me ...
not a annual calendar fan
By: rsqd : October 18th, 2010-07:54
as a result I would select the 306, then the T3 and last the 5960. The decision could be different depending on the actual purchase price of each in relation to likely resale value of each, so it would also depend to the extent you felt the economics were...
If it were me...
By: WebCalm : October 19th, 2010-07:55
...I would get 1) PP 5960 2) PP 5960 3) PP 5960! and I am a HUGE Panerai fan, I just this the PP is subliminal. I had a ROO and sold it within 3 weeks - only buy if you wear casual cloths/denims A LOT! for a perfect all-rounder you cant beat the PP. Thank...