poseidon
8
It's the 233 for me...
for no particular reason other than its aesthetic appeal. 190 would be high on my list too.
If you could choose ANY Panerai made in 1997 or later, which one would you choose?
So this excludes any Pre-V and vintage Panerai's And to make things even more interesting, you MUST choose a NON-LIMITED edition piece . Muhahaha So which regular edition Panerai produced in 1997 or later would you want Santa to bring you for Christmas if...
It would no doubt be this!
Although this would be a close second: Gotta admit I've been a good boy so Santa dropped them off a while back! While I'm at it, here my third pick! I do miss this one though... This message has been edited by Jester on 2007-12-15 20:28:18...
Dear Santa Anthony >>>
No limited edition nor Vintage, nor Pre V ??? OK: I was a very nice boy this year and I worked very well, so I hope you will put under the tree these or some of these:LOLOL Pre A 1, Pre A 2, Pre A 4, Pre A 9, (he he he, these Pre A aren't LE), Pam 7, 24 A...
Hhehe I should have narrowed down the question even more :P
should have excluded all A and B series too :P LOL Cheers, Anthony
I would take the PAM 276...
Since I have seen it in action at the Panerai event in Firenze, I have been dreaming about it. One day...... Asi...
You think the Panerai Tourbillon would look better in a Radiomir case?
Ack...I just remembered I'm asking the wrong person since you're not a fan of Radiomirs in general hehehe Cheers, Anthony
I wonder if santa Anthony can gift me the Pre-A....
So, I will pray for some simplicity that should be possibly lay down under my Christmas tree the destro 219 Cheers
these, in order...
PreA 9 PreA 2 PreA 4 PreA 1 PAM8 9A 2A 4A 1A 176G 005G Long Arrow bo
i thought all pam's were ltd editions. isnt that part of their marketing
strategy or am i just an ignorant cynic. actually i love the look of them and would at some stage love to own one, but it would have to be the 2002 calibre radiomir or something equally unusual. if they did a PVD daylight i would have bought that instead ...