sergio
[Panerai Moderator]
5725
I think that the MN...
doesn't sell. For most of the purists it's not a Panerai. The new potential buyers, do not accept it as a Panerai (which is the luminor). Even in the time of the "bubble", when every Pre-V costed serious money, the MN (except the 304 Slytech) could be bought for a song and a dance. You might every well be a...unique...in liking this thing..hahahaha
Some Mare Nostrum pictures and thoughts.
Sergio and myself are disagreeing on the Mare Nostrum. I am a big fan of this model, while Sergio doesn't like it. I think that the Mare Nostrum is a superb alternative / interesting option to or for a Panerai collection. The original was a prototype, mad...
I feel I have to....
clarify something. It's not that I don't like the MN, I just don't like chronographs in general As a matter of fact, since the MN was meant for bridge officers and there would have been some gold pieces made, one could say that it was the FIRST time that ...
I think that the MN...
doesn't sell. For most of the purists it's not a Panerai. The new potential buyers, do not accept it as a Panerai (which is the luminor). Even in the time of the "bubble", when every Pre-V costed serious money, the MN (except the 304 Slytech) could be bou...
I wish Panerai would just educate their customers a little bit and release the Mare Nostrum as a permanent model family in their collection.
A variety including chronographs and three hand movements would also be appreciated. I don't understand why Panerai is letting such a good design go to waste. Some no-name brands are making good money selling this design. Why can't Panerai do this....? Wo...