re 372

Jun 06, 2015,17:13 PM
 

yes it is a copy .and does not have the rolex engine but it does have its dna and that is all required.thanks

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

A stolen moment...

 
 By: MichaelC : May 21st, 2015-20:26
With TracieC. I still believe the 372 is Panerai's best (modern) creation....  

Indeed, a close decision.

 
 By: MichaelC : May 22nd, 2015-08:26
I have seen the 587 up close, it is awesome. Still, I prefer the 372, but you can't go wrong to own either; or both!

A great modern homage to the vintage ...

 
 By: Tank-OZ : May 21st, 2015-22:21
Wearing mine today. Greetings to yours ... Cheers, Ken ...  

Bravo, Ken. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : May 21st, 2015-22:43

Looks great! [nt]

 
 By: MichaelC : May 22nd, 2015-08:25

On a "technicality"....

 
 By: sergio : May 22nd, 2015-04:35
I don't agree with you, since the 372 it's a COPY (albeit a non-matching one, since it doesn't have the Rolex inside and the solid caseback) of the 6152 and, as such, NOT a "creation" :-)

re 372

 
 By: mariabrew : June 6th, 2015-17:13
yes it is a copy .and does not have the rolex engine but it does have its dna and that is all

The issue is NOT...DNA....

 
 By: sergio : June 7th, 2015-17:07
I was joking about it being a ...creation or copy...and because the model exsists since 1950s, the 372 it's..technically a copy, not a creation. Rolex makes...watch movements..not "engines" :-) Peace and love :-)

A good way to distiguish. Copy vs Creation.

 
 By: Bill : September 9th, 2015-17:59
Let's hope that at least we have good copies. Bill

Thanks Bill. Not super clean...

 
 By: MichaelC : August 31st, 2015-18:59
But the overall photo is OK.