joenghenry
4050
Thank you, David. The finishing of MB 16.31 split second chronograph is definitely not inferior to the CH29 caliber of my 5270. The bevelling with inward angles of MB is actually better than that of PP.
However, as the MB caliber is bigger, the overall structure therefore looks less dense or slightly "hollow" when compared to the PP one. The actuation of chronograph is also a bit smoother in the PP. However, looking at the price point of MB, I think I could not complain anything at all.....the alternative option of 5370 carries a nearly 6x price tag.
In summary, I am totally satisfied with this acquisition 
Henry
Español cuisine with the new MB split second on Sunday evening.
Wish all my friends out there a wonderful week ahead! Cheers, Henry ...
Beautiful
Handled it a few days ago at my boutique. Wasn't aware that you have already received yours - hope that you will enjoy it a lot!!
Gorgeous watch, Henry!
Be interesting to see what you think of movement finishing compared to PP. The view on these MBs with the devils tail chronograph lever is something else! David
Thank you, David. The finishing of MB 16.31 split second chronograph is definitely not inferior to the CH29 caliber of my 5270. The bevelling with inward angles of MB is actually better than that of PP.
However, as the MB caliber is bigger, the overall structure therefore looks less dense or slightly "hollow" when compared to the PP one. The actuation of chronograph is also a bit smoother in the PP. However, looking at the price point of MB, I think I co...
