ei8htohms
8555
your response reads almost as if you didn't read my post
Hi Daniel,
Of course you're free to disagree, but your post didn't indicate that you had read or understood that I'm agreeing with you about the (negligible) pressure change resulting from the motion of one's arms, just pointing out that the force of the water in motion (drag) on the crown (or pushers) can cause substantial deflection of the components and compromise the gaskets even without exceeding their pressure rating. If you read the ISOs about diving watch testing, you'll notice that one of the tests involves water resistance while the crown and/or pushers are subjected to a perpendicular force. It should be noted that the JLCs in question are not of course diving watches so would not be tested in this way, nor would they likely pass without a screw down crown. I haven't seen any actual math in this thread thus far, but feel free to insert some if you'd like.
_john
Hi, Paullin,
By: amanico : December 2nd, 2008-23:18
Have in mind the the 5 AT are ok if you don't forget to check the etancheity joint each year, my friend, as for every watch. In this case, yes, I will be confident in thre water resistance of your Reverso. Don't forget that 5 AM don't mean that you can sw...
Sure
By: expwmbat : December 3rd, 2008-11:21
My Master Hometime got wet regularly (5atm) and I didn't worry because JLC indicated in the manual that it was fine to swim with the watch . I had no problems. I also got my RGM (no screw down crown, rated to 5atm?) regularly wet giving my son a bath. The...
yes and no
By: ei8htohms : December 3rd, 2008-11:57
Hi Daniel, If JLC says it's OK to swim with it, then so be it. For my part I won't swim with a watch without a screw down crown. You're point about the speed of motion necessary to meaningfully increase the water pressure on the gaskets is well taken, but...
agree and disagree
By: expwmbat : December 3rd, 2008-12:12
I have yet to see any sort of evidence that splashing one's arms vigorously will achieve the sort of pressure change necessary to compromise 5atm of protection--the math simply doesn't work out. However, it is always prudent to have WR checked once/year i...
Sorry if I misunderstood
By: expwmbat : December 4th, 2008-05:15
I agree that arm movements associated with swimming would exert any troublesome pressure on the gaskets or the crown/pushers (is there a reason to think that the pressure one these parts would be greater or worse than the same pressure directly on the gas...
Some maths
By: BDLJ : December 4th, 2008-16:16
A simple question re: pushers. Why are non-screw chrono pushers not activated at depth? If there's enough "drag" to cause deflection of the stem then what about the static pressure inadvertantly depressing a pusher. So, what is the force on the end of a p...
Radial force on a crown
By: BDLJ : December 4th, 2008-20:41
Lots of simplifications here, so bear with me. I have simplified numbers so I can do them in my head and on the calculator in my mobile, so exact values are incorrect, but magnitude should be OK (and please correct me if I am wrong - I can take the embarr...
A question for you, John
By: BDLJ : December 8th, 2008-23:19
Hope I did not come across as a smart-alec with the maths. It's something I have heard and seen before, but never calculated myself. And we know stuff on the internet is not to be trusted ;-). A question for you as a watchmaker who has opened far far far ...