Dje
7533
In fact I heard that Nicolas only takes cold showers!!
Hi,
5atm is supposed to mean it can stabnd a water pression at around 50 meters (deep).
Some say it is 50 meters from the shore! 
I would not take any information of this kind for a total security. The watch is indeed waterproof when new and under standardized circonstances (I mean it answers a norm).
Then there's real life when you've pulled and pushed back the crown 300 times because youn like to do it (!), not screwed it perfectly when it is supposed to be screwed, kept the seals for five years without checking them........
I personnaly avoid to swim with a watch that doesn't have a screw down crown, and if the waterproofness has not been checked recently (in the last year without anything specific).
The question for next summer is: swimming with a Polaris or not? I think I'll try it at least once!
Then you must remember that you must rinse your watch after swimming, and that straps rarely like water!
Cheers
Dje
ps: regarding Nicolas taking cold showers, i would not take a watch for showering, and would not let any watch in a bathroom for a while!
Hi, Paullin,
By: amanico : December 2nd, 2008-23:18
Have in mind the the 5 AT are ok if you don't forget to check the etancheity joint each year, my friend, as for every watch. In this case, yes, I will be confident in thre water resistance of your Reverso. Don't forget that 5 AM don't mean that you can sw...
Sure
By: expwmbat : December 3rd, 2008-11:21
My Master Hometime got wet regularly (5atm) and I didn't worry because JLC indicated in the manual that it was fine to swim with the watch . I had no problems. I also got my RGM (no screw down crown, rated to 5atm?) regularly wet giving my son a bath. The...
yes and no
By: ei8htohms : December 3rd, 2008-11:57
Hi Daniel, If JLC says it's OK to swim with it, then so be it. For my part I won't swim with a watch without a screw down crown. You're point about the speed of motion necessary to meaningfully increase the water pressure on the gaskets is well taken, but...
agree and disagree
By: expwmbat : December 3rd, 2008-12:12
I have yet to see any sort of evidence that splashing one's arms vigorously will achieve the sort of pressure change necessary to compromise 5atm of protection--the math simply doesn't work out. However, it is always prudent to have WR checked once/year i...
Sorry if I misunderstood
By: expwmbat : December 4th, 2008-05:15
I agree that arm movements associated with swimming would exert any troublesome pressure on the gaskets or the crown/pushers (is there a reason to think that the pressure one these parts would be greater or worse than the same pressure directly on the gas...
Some maths
By: BDLJ : December 4th, 2008-16:16
A simple question re: pushers. Why are non-screw chrono pushers not activated at depth? If there's enough "drag" to cause deflection of the stem then what about the static pressure inadvertantly depressing a pusher. So, what is the force on the end of a p...
Radial force on a crown
By: BDLJ : December 4th, 2008-20:41
Lots of simplifications here, so bear with me. I have simplified numbers so I can do them in my head and on the calculator in my mobile, so exact values are incorrect, but magnitude should be OK (and please correct me if I am wrong - I can take the embarr...
A question for you, John
By: BDLJ : December 8th, 2008-23:19
Hope I did not come across as a smart-alec with the maths. It's something I have heard and seen before, but never calculated myself. And we know stuff on the internet is not to be trusted ;-). A question for you as a watchmaker who has opened far far far ...