Sandgroper
3262
What I meant is that Ultra thin or just thin, to me.....
there is not much difference. I agree though that a very flat watch over 40mm looks weird on the wrist. Also, I am not sure about when the Ultra thin finishes and the just thin start, what are the criteria? As for the Geophysique I am sure that JLC will make a "Tribute to" within the next two years
A+ l'ami.
Francois
I love the 39 mm version
By: dr.kol : February 21st, 2013-00:35
and ultra-thin watches in general. But I don't agree with you completely: there are quite many around like the examples I posted yesterday or some others earlier... Just to give a few examples... Anyhow, I must admit that the ones made by JLC are among th...
On another side, Ken...
By: amanico : February 21st, 2013-14:18
Think about how many Memovoxes JLC released in the Fifties, and even more in the Sixties? There were so many that I am unable to make a properexhaustive review of all of them! Same for the Vintage Reversos, and even worse, the Chronos! It has most always ...
MG UT 41
By: Mark in Paris : February 21st, 2013-13:03
Hi Nicolas, This is a very nice watch... but not my type of ultra thin. I like this little old look feeling about this watch even if I prefer a modern touch (that I find in the Jubilee) but I remember when I tried a Patrimony Contemporaine for the 1st tim...
disappointment
By: xsw : April 20th, 2013-13:46
first is the solid caseback. it's hard to connect with a watch if you can't see it. second is the automatique. It takes away your power to give it life and now it just does everything itself! but it looks great still.